Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34554013›Full record

ArticleClinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2022

Naloxone therapy for prescription and illicit opioid poisoning cases aged 50 + in the national poison data system, 2015-2020.

Namkee G Choi, Bryan Y Choi, Diana M DiNitto, C Nathan Marti, S David Baker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Accidental substance-related acute toxicity deaths in older adults in 2016 and 2017: a national chart review study.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Namkee G ChoiSteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Bryan Y ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine & Bayhealth Medical Center, Dover, DE, USA.
Diana M DiNittoSteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
C Nathan MartiSteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
S David BakerCentral Texas Poison Center, Temple, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine · USWashington Poison Center · US

Funding

Program Development and Pilot CoreP30AG066614 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DEBRA J. UMBERSON · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextOlder adults are less likely than younger adults to receive naloxone therapy. Given high rates of prescription opioid use/misuse and increasing illicit opioid use among older adults, factors associated with naloxone administration for older opioid poisoning cases need examination.

methodsWe analyzed the 83,135 opioid-involved cases aged 50+ from the 2015-2020 National Poison Data System. Single-variable logistic regression was used to examine associations of naloxone administration with demographic factors, exposure site/reason, medical outcomes, management site/level of care, clinical effects, and other interventions. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to examine associations of naloxone administration with different types of opioids.

resultsOver the six years, the proportion of prescription opioid cases that received naloxone therapy increased steadily from 21.9% to 28.4%. The proportion of illicit opioid cases that received naloxone therapy was 51.9% in 2015 and 59.8% in 2020 with a high of 64.4% in 2019. In 2020, the death rate for illicit opioid cases without naloxone therapy was 31.4% compared to 2.3% for those with the therapy. Cases managed at healthcare facilities (HCF) had higher odds of receiving naloxone therapy. Among prescription opioid cases, naloxone therapy rates among older and female cases and those managed at non-HCF settings were especially low even for major medical outcomes. Cases involving oxycodone, morphine, methadone, prescription fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxymorphone, and other/unknown opioids had higher odds of naloxone administration. DISCUSSION: Rates of naloxone therapy for older prescription opioid poisoning cases need improvement. While rates were higher among illicit opioid cases, the drop in 2020 and the sharp increase in deaths among illicit opioid cases without naloxone therapy confirm the importance of access to this life-saving intervention.

conclusionsIncreased naloxone co-prescribing and other means of facilitating access to naloxone are needed to prevent opioid poisoning deaths among older adults who use prescription opioids.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersPoisonsAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNaloxonePrescriptionsAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxonePoisonsCNS depressionillicit opioidsnaloxoneolder adultsopioid poisoningPoison control centersprescription opioids

Identifiers

PMID34554013
PMCPMC9904880
OpenAlexW3199109692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.