Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553796›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.

Stephanie J Galla, Liz Brown, Yvette Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae, Ilina Cubrinovska, Daryl Eason, Rebecca M Gooley, Jill A Hamilton, Julie A Heath, Samantha S Hauser, Emily K Latch and 6 more

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PidTools: Algorithm and web tools for crop pedigree identification analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Pedigree analysis in the mhorr gazelle (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New tools for the recovery of the kākāpō.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Stephanie J GallaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4650-8067
Liz BrownNew Zealand Department of Conservation, Twizel, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4245-3900
Yvette Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti WaewaeTe Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, Te Whare o Te Waipounamu, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Ilina CubrinovskaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Daryl EasonNew Zealand Department of Conservation, Invercargill, Southland, New Zealand.
Rebecca M GooleySmithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, Front Royal, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-6296
Jill A HamiltonDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3041-0508
Julie A HeathDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9606-1689
Samantha S HauserDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3404-5253
Emily K LatchDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-1056
Marjorie D MatocqDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-3749
Anne RichardsonThe Isaac Conservation and Wildlife Trust, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Jana R WoldSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-4282
Carolyn J HoggSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-398X
Anna W SantureSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-1042
Tammy E SteevesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2112-5761

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) Endeavour Fund UOCX1602National Science Foundation Track 2 EPSCoR Program OIA-1826801Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program RC-2702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 50 years conservation genetics has developed a substantive toolbox to inform species management. One of the most long-standing tools available to manage genetics-the pedigree-has been widely used to characterize diversity and maximize evolutionary potential in threatened populations. Now, with the ability to use high throughput sequencing to estimate relatedness, inbreeding, and genome-wide functional diversity, some have asked whether it is warranted for conservation biologists to continue collecting and collating pedigrees for species management. In this perspective, we argue that pedigrees remain a relevant tool, and when combined with genomic data, create an invaluable resource for conservation genomic management. Genomic data can address pedigree pitfalls (e.g., founder relatedness, missing data, uncertainty), and in return robust pedigrees allow for more nuanced research design, including well-informed sampling strategies and quantitative analyses (e.g., heritability, linkage) to better inform genomic inquiry. We further contend that building and maintaining pedigrees provides an opportunity to strengthen trusted relationships among conservation researchers, practitioners, Indigenous Peoples, and Local Communities.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenomicsConservation of Natural ResourcesGenomeInbreedingPedigreeconservation genomicsex situin situkinshippedigreequantitative genetics

Identifiers

PMID34553796
PMCPMC9298073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.