ArticleMedical education online2021
'Demystifying' the encounter with adolescent patients: a qualitative study on medical students' experiences and perspectives during training with adolescent simulated patients.
Article in Medical education online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The use of adolescent standardized patients to teach psychosocial risk assessment and its impact on medical student self‑efficacy.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Harnessing lived experience in health professions simulation-based education: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026Article
- Adolescent-Parent Dyad and Adolescent Eating Disorders: A Standardized Patient Simulation.Cureus · 2026Article
- A Novel Pediatric Clinical Skills Curriculum to Prepare Medical Students for Pediatrics Clerkship.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Applying a Trauma-Informed Lens to Challenging Adolescent Encounters: A Faculty Development Session for Pediatricians.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024Article
- Perspectives from the periphery of Paediatrics.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training with adolescent simulated patients (ASP) is increasingly recognized as an effective form of teaching interviewing skills with adolescent patients. Beyond the acknowledged effectiveness and satisfaction of training with ASP, little is known on medical students' actual experience and specific learning needs related to simulated encounters with ASP, as well as factors influencing their learning experience.The aim of this study was an in-depth exploration of medical students' perspectives about training with ASP.Using a qualitative design with grounded theory methods, we conducted in-field observation of training sessions with ASP and individual interviews with eighteen fourth-year medical students participating in training.When provided with an actual experience in a simulated setting, students go through a process of anticipating then modulating the challenge of the encounter with an adolescent patient. This challenge is influenced and modulated within 3 main dimensions: preconceptions about adolescents, level of experience with adolescent patients and professional distance. This process is also influenced by how students perceive and cope with the educational setting.Training with ASP, as a first concrete experience of an adolescent consultation, is an opportunity to address important aspects of students' attitudes towards adolescent patients such as students' preconceptions, personal experiences and feelings that could influence the doctor-patient relationship later on. Training should focus on ways to reflect upon and handle such attitudes and the emotional resonance experienced by medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.