Observational studyJournal of cosmetic dermatology2022
Proposal of a self-assessment questionnaire for the diagnosis of sensitive skin.
Observational study in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensitive Skin in Thais: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Diagnostic Cutoff Scores.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- From consistent subjective assessment of skin sensitivity severity to its accurate objective scoring.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
- Proposal of a self-assessment questionnaire for the diagnosis of sensitive skin.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSensitive skin is very common and distressing. Its diagnosis may be difficult with the tools/methods available at the moment.
aimsTo assess the reliability of a self-assessment questionnaire for the diagnosis of sensitive skin, using the results of lactic acid stinging test (LAST) as a reference for the identification of subjects suffering from this condition. A further objective was to identify the questionnaire cutoff score that better discriminates between subjects with or without sensitive skin. PATIENTS/
methodsAmong the adult volunteers included in this observational, cross-sectional study, both LAST-positive subjects, who were considered as having sensitive skin ("patients"), and negative ones ("controls") completed the questionnaire. It consisted of a part for self-assessing and quantifying (0-10) sensitive skin and another one that included 10 items, each referring to a specific, potentially triggering stimulus. A cumulative score (questionnaire-based skin sensitivity score, 0-10) was calculated from the sum of all items considered capable of triggering unpleasant skin sensations in real-life experience.
resultsOne hundred and sixty-two subjects were enrolled, 102 patients and 60 controls; 98 subjects thought they had sensitive skin. The mean questionnaire-based skin sensitivity score was significantly higher among patients than controls and correlated with skin sensitivity self-assessments. A cutoff value of 3 was set for the identification of LAST-positive subjects, with 79% accuracy.
conclusionsThe study self-assessment questionnaire seems to be a reliable tool for diagnosing sensitive skin in clinical practice. These results led us to identify a numerical cutoff for detecting propensity to experience sensitive skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.