Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553470›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Evaluation of eye care and ocular findings in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Zarife Ekici Gok, Abdullah Gok, Leman Acun Delen, Umut S Kasapoglu, Esra Gurbuz, Kayhan Mutlu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zarife Ekici GokDepartment of Ophthalmology, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-9618
Abdullah GokDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-8437
Leman Acun DelenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9441-6979
Umut S KasapogluDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-9872
Esra GurbuzDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-0963
Kayhan MutluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aksaray University School of Medicine, Aksaray, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7447-2551
Malatya Devlet Hastanesi · TRAksaray University · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study aimed to evaluate eyecare needs along with ocular findings in patients treated in intensive care units because of Covid-19 infection. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 93 patients, 58 men and 35 women, who were under follow-up and treatment in intensive care because of COVID-19 infection from 1 January 2021 to 15 February 2021 were included in the study. Detailed eye examinations of the patients were performed with a portable handheld biomicroscope, direct and indirect ophthalmoscope. Cases requiring treatment for eye diseases were identified and treated.

resultsThe mean patient age was 68.32 ± 9.97 years; 35 patients were followed up and treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation and 58 patients with invasive mechanical ventilation support. Mild, moderate, and severe chemosis was observed in 19 patients (20.4%), 10 patients (10.8%) and 4 patients (4.3%), respectively. Conjunctivitis (8.6%) was observed in eight patients. Corneal abrasion was present in seven patients (7.5%). Keratitis secondary to exposure keratopathy was observed in one patient. Eye care and medical treatment were initiated for these patients. We noted eight patients (8.6%) with retinal haemorrhage; however, to the best of our knowledge, these patients may show acute retinal involvement secondary to systemic diseases or have previous retinal findings other than Covid-19 infection or treatments.

conclusionFindings of ocular involvement because of COVID-19 infection were detected in the present study. Retinal haemorrhages were detected in addition to the common findings in viral infections. Especially in patients supported with mechanical ventilation, the detection and treatment of conditions that require eye care for exposure keratopathy are very important for recovering from the disease and the quality of vision.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical IllnessAgedCritical CareFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34553470
PMCPMC8646937
OpenAlexW3201473552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.