Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553388›Full record

ArticleFamily process2021

Strengthening lower-income families: Lessons learned from policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jeremy B Kanter, Deadric T Williams, Amy J Rauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Family Structural Dimensions: A Correlational Study.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeremy B KanterDepartment of Child and Family Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4087-7689
Deadric T WilliamsDepartment of Sociology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Amy J RauerDepartment of Child and Family Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4272-7641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Families are navigating an unstable economy due to COVID-19. Financial stressors have the potential to strain intimate relationships and exacerbate prior inequities across lower-income families. Notably, the economic impact of COVID-19 disproportionately influenced Black and Latinx families. As a response to families' economic adversity during the pandemic, the federal government initiated the CARES Act. This type of federal response to lower-income families, however, is not new. The purpose of this paper is to contextualize and historicize previous and current efforts to mitigate the consequences of financial hardship on families by comparing the assumptions and efficacy of the Healthy Marriages Initiative and the CARES act. We conclude with four recommendations to promote well-being in lower-income families: (1) acknowledging and reducing inequities that disproportionally impact families racialized as Black or Latinx; (2) intervening to mitigate stressors surrounding families; (3) using innovative methods to deliver relationship education; and (4) considering prevention versus intervention strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansIncomePolicySARS-CoV-2COVID-19familias de bajos recursosfinancial stressHealthy Marriage InitiativeIniciativa para Matrimonios Saludableslower-income familiesmedidas adoptadaspolicy responsestensión financiera低收入家庭健康婚姻倡议政策反应经济压力

Identifiers

PMID34553388
PMCPMC8652884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.