Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553290›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Tick-borne zoonotic agents infecting horses from an urban area in Midwestern Brazil: epidemiological and hematological features.

João Bosco Vilela Campos, Filipe Santos Martins, Carina Elisei de Oliveira, Amanda Alves Taveira, João Roberto de Oliveira, Luiz Ricardo Gonçalves, Matheus Dias Cordeiro, Ana Claudia Calchi, Lina de Campos Binder, Maria Carolina de Azevedo Serpa and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

João Bosco Vilela CamposLaboratory Insana Huna, Interface Between Animal, Environmental and Human Health, Department of Biosaúde, University Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.
Filipe Santos MartinsLaboratory Insana Huna, Interface Between Animal, Environmental and Human Health, Department of Biosaúde, University Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil. filipemsantos@outlook.com.
Carina Elisei de OliveiraLaboratory Insana Huna, Interface Between Animal, Environmental and Human Health, Department of Biosaúde, University Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.
Amanda Alves TaveiraLaboratory Insana Huna, Interface Between Animal, Environmental and Human Health, Department of Biosaúde, University Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.
João Roberto de OliveiraLaboratory Insana Huna, Interface Between Animal, Environmental and Human Health, Department of Biosaúde, University Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.
Luiz Ricardo GonçalvesImmunoparasitology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus Dias CordeiroLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, University Federal Rural Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Claudia CalchiImmunoparasitology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lina de Campos BinderDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Carolina de Azevedo SerpaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amália Regina Mar BarbieriDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo B LabrunaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosangela Zacarias MachadoImmunoparasitology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gisele Braziliano de AndradeLaboratory Insana Huna, Interface Between Animal, Environmental and Human Health, Department of Biosaúde, University Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.
Marcos Rogério AndréImmunoparasitology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Heitor Miraglia HerreraLaboratory Insana Huna, Interface Between Animal, Environmental and Human Health, Department of Biosaúde, University Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil. filipemsantos@outlook.com.
Universidade Católica Dom Bosco · BRNúcleo de Pesquisas Aplicadas (Brazil) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

conselho nacional de desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico 302420 / 2017-7conselho nacional de desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico 308768/2017-5fundação de amparo à pesquisa do estado de são paulo 59/300.187/2016fundação de apoio ao desenvolvimento do ensino, ciência e tecnologia do estado de mato grosso do sul 59/300.187/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of tick-borne diseases has been reported as a serious problem in public health worldwide and many aspects of its epidemiology and effects on the health of its hosts are unclear. We aimed to perform an epidemiological study of tick-borne zoonotic Rickettsia, Borrelia, and Anaplasmataceae in horses from Midwestern Brazil. We also evaluated whether Borrelia spp. and Anaplasmataceae may be associated with hematological disorders in the sampled animals. Blood and serum samples as well as ticks were collected from 262 horses. Serum samples were used to perform serological tests, and hematological analyses were made using whole blood. Furthermore, DNA extracted from whole blood and ticks was used for molecular tests. Campo Grande is enzootic for tick-borne studied bacteria, since we found an overall exposure of 59.9% of the sampled horses, 28.7% of them presented co-exposure. Seropositivity rates of 20.6% for Borrelia spp., 25.6% for Rickettsia spp., and 31.6% for Anaplasmataceae were found in the sampled horses. Considering both molecular and serological tests for Borrelia spp., the infection rate was 48.0% (126/262). None of the tested horses showed molecular positivity for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. The horses sampled displayed 7.2% of parasitism by ixodid ticks in single and coinfestations. We did not find DNA of any studied bacteria in the sampled ticks. Positive horses for Borrelia spp. and Anaplasmataceae agents displayed leukopenia, monocytopenia, and lymphopenia. Together, our results suggest that horses may play a role as sentinel host for zoonotic bacteria and Borrelia spp. and Anaplasmataceae agents can impair the health of horses.

Indexed as

BorreliaHorse DiseasesIxodesRickettsiaTick-Borne DiseasesAnimalsBrazilHorsesAnaplasmataceaeBorrelia spp.Rickettsia spp.Sentinel hostsTicks

Identifiers

PMID34553290
PMCPMC8457776
OpenAlexW3200029824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.