Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553289›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2021

Gut and faecal bacterial community of the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus: potential use for monitoring exposure scenarios.

Jacinta M M Oliveira, Isabel Henriques, Daniel S Read, Hyun S Gweon, Rui G Morgado, Sara Peixoto, António Correia, Amadeu M V M Soares, Susana Loureiro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacinta M M OliveiraCESAM- Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-7912
Isabel HenriquesUniversity of Coimbra, CESAM & Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Calçada Martins de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal. isabel.henriques@uc.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-4939
Daniel S ReadCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-5154
Hyun S GweonCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-6301
Rui G MorgadoCESAM- Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6772-3762
Sara PeixotoCESAM- Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3005-7492
António CorreiaCESAM- Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5115-1429
Amadeu M V M SoaresCESAM- Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-9470
Susana LoureiroCESAM- Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-9623
University of Aveiro · PTUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

fundação para a ciência e a tecnologia SFRH/BD/117738/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aimed to characterize the gut and faeces bacterial communities (BC) of Porcellionides pruinosus using high-throughput sequencing. Isopods were collected from the field and kept in laboratory conditions similar to those normally applied in ecotoxicology tests. Faeces and purged guts of isopods (n = 3 × 30) were analysed by pyrosequencing the V3-V4 region of 16 S rRNA encoding gene. Results showed that gut and faecal BCs were dominated by Proteobacteria, particularly by an OTU (Operational Taxonomic Unit) affiliated to genus Coxiella. Diversity and richness values were statistically higher for faecal BC, mainly due to the occurrence of several low-abundance phylotypes. These results may reflect faecal carriage of bacterial groups that cannot settle in the gut. BCs of P. pruinosus comprised: (1) common members of the soil microbiota, (2) bacterial symbionts, (3) bacteria related to host metabolic/ecological features, and (4) bacterial etiological agents. Comparison of BC of this isopod species with the BC from other invertebrates revealed common bacterial groups across taxa. The baseline information provided by this work will assist the design and data interpretation of future ecotoxicological or biomonitoring assays where the analysis of P. pruinosus BC should be included as an additional indicator. CAPSULE: Terrestrial isopods bacterial communities might support ecotoxicological assays and biomonitoring processes as a valuable tool.

Indexed as

IsopodaSoil PollutantsAnimalsBacteriaFecesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil PollutantsBacterial communityEcotoxicological indicatorFaecesGutsPorcellionides pruinosusPyrosequencing

Identifiers

PMID34553289
OpenAlexW3201198723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.