Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553213›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2021

Bias-invariant RNA-sequencing metadata annotation.

Hannes Wartmann, Sven Heins, Karin Kloiber, Stefan Bonn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Metadata retrieval from sequence databases with ffq.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannes WartmannInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Center for Biomedical AI, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4344-7024
Sven HeinsInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Center for Biomedical AI, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Karin KloiberInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Center for Biomedical AI, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan BonnInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Center for Biomedical AI, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-5662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent technological advances have resulted in an unprecedented increase in publicly available biomedical data, yet the reuse of the data is often precluded by experimental bias and a lack of annotation depth and consistency. Missing annotations makes it impossible for researchers to find datasets specific to their needs.

findingsHere, we investigate RNA-sequencing metadata prediction based on gene expression values. We present a deep-learning-based domain adaptation algorithm for the automatic annotation of RNA-sequencing metadata. We show, in multiple experiments, that our model is better at integrating heterogeneous training data compared with existing linear regression-based approaches, resulting in improved tissue type classification. By using a model architecture similar to Siamese networks, the algorithm can learn biases from datasets with few samples.

conclusionUsing our novel domain adaptation approach, we achieved metadata annotation accuracies up to 15.7% better than a previously published method. Using the best model, we provide a list of >10,000 novel tissue and sex label annotations for 8,495 unique SRA samples. Our approach has the potential to revive idle datasets by automated annotation making them more searchable.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetadataBiasMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNASequence Analysis, RNARNAautomated annotationbias invariance; deep learning; computational biology; bioinformaticsdata reusabilitydomain adaptationmachine learningRNA-seq metadata

Identifiers

PMID34553213
PMCPMC8559615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.