Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553195›Full record

ArticleUI journal2020

Investigating a multiple mentor model in research training for undergraduates traditionally underrepresented in biomedical sciences.

Thomas E Keller, Jennifer Lindwall

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in UI journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas E KellerSchool of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, OR.
Jennifer LindwallDepartment of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, OR.
Portland State University · US

Funding

EXITO: Enhancing Cross-disciplinary Infrastructure and Training at OregonUL1GM118964 · NIGMS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, THOMAS E · 2015 to 2023
$18.0M
EXITO: Enhancing Cross-disciplinary Infrastructure and Training at OregonRL5GM118963 · NIGMS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, THOMAS E · 2015 to 2023
$11.9M
EXITO: Enhancing Cross-disciplinary Infrastructure and Training at OregonTL4GM118965 · NIGMS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, THOMAS E · 2015 to 2022
$10.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118963NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118965NIGMS NIH HHS UL1 GM118964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of persistence and success in undergraduate research training emphasize the importance of engagement and integration across social, educational, research, and career settings. Students are likely to benefit from multiple sources of mentoring to meet their multi-dimensional needs for support across these domains. As part of a comprehensive training initiative for traditionally underrepresented students aspiring to careers in biomedical research, BUILD EXITO implemented a multiple mentoring model matching each undergraduate scholar with a research mentor, a faculty mentor, and a peer mentor. By design, each mentor has a different functional role. The current study investigates whether the nature of support scholars actually receive differs by type of mentor. The data are activity records (n=11,756) generated from monthly logs on which scholars (n=223) indicated the form of support received from each mentor by selecting from several items (e.g. personal support, making connections, career advising). Analyses with repeated-measures ANOVA indicate that peer mentors are more likely to address scholars' personal lives, academic skills, and connections to campus programs and services. Career mentors focus on advising related to academics, academic progress, and careers. Research mentors, although also providing career advising and addressing personal life, primarily engage scholars in research-related training activities. The findings confirm that each type of mentor provides a distinctive pattern of support for undergraduate scholars, suggesting that students in comprehensive programs emphasizing academic success, research training, and career development may benefit from multiple sources of mentoring.

Identifiers

PMID34553195
PMCPMC8455095
OpenAlexW3034708946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.