Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553171›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2021

Accurate prediction of B-form/A-form DNA conformation propensity from primary sequence: A machine learning and free energy handshake.

Abhijit Gupta, Mandar Kulkarni, Arnab Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Non-canonical DNA structures in the human ribosomal DNA.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abhijit GuptaDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.
Mandar KulkarniDivision of Biophysical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Center, P.O.B. 124, 22100 Lund, Sweden.
Arnab MukherjeeDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA carries the genetic code of life, with different conformations associated with different biological functions. Predicting the conformation of DNA from its primary sequence, although desirable, is a challenging problem owing to the polymorphic nature of DNA. We have deployed a host of machine learning algorithms, including the popular state-of-the-art LightGBM (a gradient boosting model), for building prediction models. We used the nested cross-validation strategy to address the issues of "overfitting" and selection bias. This simultaneously provides an unbiased estimate of the generalization performance of a machine learning algorithm and allows us to tune the hyperparameters optimally. Furthermore, we built a secondary model based on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) that offers crucial insight into model interpretability. Our detailed model-building strategy and robust statistical validation protocols tackle the formidable challenge of working on small datasets, which is often the case in biological and medical data.

Indexed as

DNA conformationDNA sequencegenomeLightGBMmachine learningnested cross-validation

Identifiers

PMID34553171
PMCPMC8441556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.