Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553167›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2021

Situated language learning via interactive narratives.

Prithviraj Ammanabrolu, Mark O Riedl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prithviraj AmmanabroluSchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 756 W Peachtree St NW, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark O RiedlSchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 756 W Peachtree St NW, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides a roadmap that explores the question of how to imbue learning agents with the ability to understand and generate contextually relevant natural language in service of achieving a goal. We hypothesize that two key components in creating such agents are interactivity and environment grounding, shown to be vital parts of language learning in humans, and posit that interactive narratives should be the environments of choice for such training these agents. These games are simulations in which an agent interacts with the world through natural language-perceiving, acting upon, and talking to the world using textual descriptions, commands, and dialogue-and, as such, exist at the intersection of natural language processing, storytelling, and sequential decision making. We discuss the unique challenges a text games' puzzle-like structure combined with natural language state-and-action spaces provides: knowledge representation, common-sense reasoning, and exploration. Beyond the challenges described so far, progress in the realm of interactive narratives can be applied in adjacent problem domains. These applications provide interesting challenges of their own as well as extensions to those discussed so far. We describe three of them in detail: (1) evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) systems' common-sense understanding by automatically creating interactive narratives; (2) adapting abstract text-based policies to include other modalities, such as vision; and (3) enabling multi-agent and human-AI collaboration in shared, situated worlds.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceinteractive narratives 2021 MSC: 00-01 99-00natural language processingreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID34553167
PMCPMC8441575
OpenAlexW3136135338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.