Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553124›Full record

ArticleAdvanced theory and simulations2020

Application of the ESMACS Binding Free Energy Protocol to a Multi-Binding Site Lactate Dehydogenase A Ligand Dataset.

David W Wright, Fouad Husseini, Shunzhou Wan, Christophe Meyer, Herman van Vlijmen, Gary Tresadern, Peter V Coveney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced theory and simulations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Uncertainty quantification in classical molecular dynamics.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David W WrightCentre for Computational Science Department of Chemistry University College London London WC1H 0AJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-8044
Fouad HusseiniCentre for Computational Science Department of Chemistry University College London London WC1H 0AJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-2622
Shunzhou WanCentre for Computational Science Department of Chemistry University College London London WC1H 0AJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-1999
Christophe MeyerJanssen Research & Development Turnhoutseweg 30 B-2340 Beerse Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-1741
Herman van VlijmenJanssen Research & Development Turnhoutseweg 30 B-2340 Beerse Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1915-3141
Gary TresadernJanssen Research & Development Turnhoutseweg 30 B-2340 Beerse Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-1644
Peter V CoveneyCentre for Computational Science Department of Chemistry University College London London WC1H 0AJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8787-7256

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L016311/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the use of fragment-based lead generation has become a common, mature approach to identify tractable starting points in chemical space for the drug discovery process. This approach naturally involves the study of the binding properties of highly heterogeneous ligands. Such datasets challenge computational techniques to provide comparable binding free energy estimates from different binding modes. The performance of a range of statistically robust ensemble-based binding free energy calculation protocols, called ESMACS (enhanced sampling of molecular dynamics with approximation of continuum solvent), is evaluated. Ligands designed to target two binding pockets in the lactate dehydogenase, a target protein, which vary in size, charge, and binding mode, are studied. When compared to experimental results, excellent statistical rankings are obtained across this highly diverse set of ligands. In addition, three approaches to account for entropic contributions are investigated: 1) normal mode analysis, 2) weighted solvent accessible surface area (WSAS), and 3) variational entropy. Normal mode analysis and WSAS correlate strongly with each other-although the latter is computationally far cheaper-but do not improve rankings. Variational entropy corrects exaggerated discrimination of ligands bound in different pockets but creates three outliers which reduce the quality of the overall ranking.

Indexed as

binding free energy calculationsfragment‐based drug designmolecular dynamicsmolecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MMPBSA)

Identifiers

PMID34553124
PMCPMC8438761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.