Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34553096›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical mycology2021

Effect of

Seyed Afzal Musavinasab-Mobarakeh, Masoomeh Shams-Ghahfarokhi, Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical mycology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Effect ofCurrent medical mycology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seyed Afzal Musavinasab-MobarakehDepartment of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Masoomeh Shams-GhahfarokhiDepartment of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi Razzaghi-AbyanehDepartment of Mycology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis study aimed to investigate the effects of MATERIALS AND

methodsThe minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of EAC was determined based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A4 method at a concentration range of 125-4000 µg/ml. The EAC synergism activity was determined in combination with fluconazole (FCZ) as an antifungal azole. Laccase activity, melanin production, and cell membrane ergosterol content of

resultsBased on obtained results, MIC of EAC and FCZ were 2000 and 128 μg/ml, respectively. A combinatory effect was reported for FCZ and EAC by a fractional inhibitory concentration index of 0.25. The cell membrane ergosterol content was inhibited in EAC- and FCZ-treated

conclusionThe findings revealed that EAC contains inhibitory compounds which interact with biological activities in

Indexed as

Allium cepaAntifungal activityCryptococcus neoformansLAC1 gene expressionLaccase

Identifiers

PMID34553096
PMCPMC8443871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.