ArticleMDM policy & practice
Implementing an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool Into Routine Care: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perceptions of a Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction Tool.
Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Patient Decision Aid for Antiobesity Medications: Mixed Methods Study of Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Redesigning the Hospital Environment to Improve Restfulness.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- A scoping review, novel taxonomy and catalogue of implementation frameworks for clinical decision support systems.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Implementation of BREASTChoice , a Multilevel Breast Reconstruction Decision Support Tool With Personalized Risk Prediction.Annals of surgery · 2024Article
- Exploring key components and factors that influence the use of clinical decision- support tools for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease: the perspective of healthcare providers.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Factors influencing the implementation of a guideline for re-engagement in HIV care in primary care settings in Johannesburg, South Africa: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Using the sociotechnical model to conduct a focused usability assessment of a breast reconstruction decision tool.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Barriers and Facilitators for Shared Decision Making in Breast Reconstruction among Stakeholders in the Chinese Context: A Qualitative Study.MDM policy & practiceArticle
- Integrating a Patient Decision Aid into the Electronic Health Record: A Case Report on the Implementation of BREASTChoice at 2 Sites.MDM policy & practiceArticle
- Discussing Cost and Value in Patient Decision Aids and Shared Decision Making: A Call to Action.MDM policy & practiceReview
- Financial Toxicity Considerations in Breast Reconstruction: Recommendations for Research and Practice.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.