ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Diagnosis of Arrhythmia for Patients with Occult Coronary Heart Disease Guided by Intracavitary Electrocardiogram under Data Mining Algorithm.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the application value of intracavitary electrocardiogram- (IEGM-) guided diagnosis of occult heart disease and conventional electrocardiogram (EGM) in the diagnosis of occult coronary heart disease (CHD) based on the classification and regression tree (CART) mining algorithm, hoping to provide a more effective basis for clinical diagnosis of the occult CHD. In this study, 100 patients with occult CHD admitted to our hospital from February 2016 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects. Based on the random number table method, 100 patients were randomly rolled into two groups, each with 50 cases. The patients diagnosed with conventional ECG were set as the control group, and patients in the experimental group were diagnosed with IEGM under the data mining algorithms. The diagnostic effects of the two groups were compared. The results showed that the processing effect of the CART algorithm (94%) was much better than that of the multiple linear regression algorithm (78%) and the random forest algorithm (69%) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.