ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
High-Efficiency Classification of White Blood Cells Based on Object Detection.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parameter-Reduced YOLOv8n with GhostConv and C3Ghost for Automated Blood Cell Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Attention-Based Dual-Path Deep Learning for Blood Cell Image Classification Using ConvNeXt and Swin Transformer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- An explainable AI-based blood cell classification using optimized convolutional neural network.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- A large multi-focus dataset for white blood cell classification.Scientific data · 2024Article
- White blood cells classification using multi-fold pre-processing and optimized CNN model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Leukocyte subtype classification with multi-model fusion.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Article
- Nanomedicine Ex Machina: Between Model-Informed Development and Artificial Intelligence.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
White blood cells (WBCs) play a significant role in the human immune system, and the content of various subtypes of WBCs is usually maintained within a certain range in the human body, while deviant levels are important warning signs for diseases. Hence, the detection and classification of WBCs is an essential diagnostic technique. However, traditional WBC classification technologies based on image processing usually need to segment the collected target cell images from the background. This preprocessing operation not only increases the workload but also heavily affects the classification quality and efficiency. Therefore, we proposed one high-efficiency object detection technology that combines the segmentation and recognition of targets into one step to realize the detection and classification of WBCs in an image at the same time. Two state-of-the-art object detection models, Faster RCNN and Yolov4, were employed and comparatively studied to classify neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes on a balanced and enhanced Blood Cell Count Dataset (BCCD). Our experimental results showed that the Faster RCNN and Yolov4 based deep transfer learning models achieved classification accuracy rates of 96.25% and 95.75%, respectively. For the one-stage model, Yolov4, while ensuring more than 95% accuracy, its detection speed could reach 60 FPS, which showed better performance compared with the two-stage model, Faster RCNN. The high-efficiency object detection network that does not require cell presegmentation can remove the difficulty of image preprocessing and greatly improve the efficiency of the entire classification task, which provides a potential solution for future real-time point-of-care diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.