ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021
Automatic Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Mask R-CNN Algorithm with Color Doppler Echocardiography Images.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantification of mitral regurgitation: from traditional methods to artificial intelligence.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in the clinical management and prognostication of mitral regurgitation: a systematic review.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Accuracy of machine learning models for mitral regurgitation severity assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Mitral regurgitation detection and central/eccentric classification using transformer-based deep learning in multi-view echocardiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in heart and brain ultrasound: the least you need to know.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- A fully convolutional neural network for the quantification of mitral regurgitation in echocardiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- A deep learning-based method for assessing tricuspid regurgitation using continuous wave Doppler spectra.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Automatic Segmentation and Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation Using Doppler Echocardiographic Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automatic Segmentation and Assessment of Valvular Regurgitations with Color Doppler Echocardiography Images: A VABC-UNet-Based Framework.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning for Echocardiography: Introduction for Clinicians and Future Vision: State-of-the-Art Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity is critical in clinical diagnosis and treatment. No single echocardiographic method has been recommended for MR quantification thus far. We sought to define the feasibility and accuracy of the mask regions with a convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN) algorithm in the automatic qualitative evaluation of MR using color Doppler echocardiography images. The authors collected 1132 cases of MR from hospital A and 295 cases of MR from hospital B and divided them into the following four types according to the 2017 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines: grade I (mild), grade II (moderate), grade III (moderate), and grade IV (severe). Both grade II and grade III are moderate. After image marking with the LabelMe software, a method using the Mask R-CNN algorithm based on deep learning (DL) was used to evaluate MR severity. We used the data from hospital A to build the artificial intelligence (AI) model and conduct internal verification, and we used the data from hospital B for external verification. According to severity, the accuracy of classification was 0.90, 0.89, and 0.91 for mild, moderate, and severe MR, respectively. The Macro F1 and Micro F1 coefficients were 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. According to grading, the accuracy of classification was 0.90, 0.87, 0.81, and 0.91 for grade I, grade II, grade III, and grade IV, respectively. The Macro F1 and Micro F1 coefficients were 0.89 and 0.89, respectively. Automatic assessment of MR severity is feasible with the Mask R-CNN algorithm and color Doppler electrocardiography images collected in accordance with the 2017 ASE guidelines, and the model demonstrates reasonable performance and provides reliable qualitative results for MR severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.