Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

A Pluralistic Perspective on Research in Psychotherapy: Harnessing Passion, Difference and Dialogue to Promote Justice and Relevance.

Kate Smith, John McLeod, Nicola Blunden, Mick Cooper, Lynne Gabriel, Christine Kupfer, Julia McLeod, Marie-Clare Murphie, Hanne Weie Oddli, Mhairi Thurston and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kate SmithSchool of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.
John McLeodSchool of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Nicola BlundenMetanoia Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Mick CooperDepartment of Psychology, Roehampton University, London, United Kingdom.
Lynne GabrielSchool of Education, Language and Psychology, York St John University, York, United Kingdom.
Christine KupferSchool of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Julia McLeodSchool of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Marie-Clare MurphieSchool of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Hanne Weie OddliDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Mhairi ThurstonSchool of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Laura Anne WinterManchester Institute of Education, Schools of Environment, Education, and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of a pluralistic perspective on research design, processes of data collection and analysis and dissemination of findings, has the potential to enable psychotherapy research to make a more effective contribution to building a just society. A review of the key features of the concept of pluralism is followed by a historical analysis of the ways in which research in counselling, psychotherapy and related disciplines has moved in the direction of a pluralistic position around knowledge creation. Core principles of a pluralistic approach to research are identified and explored in the context of a critical case study of contemporary research into psychotherapy for depression, examples of pluralistically oriented research practices, and analysis of a pluralistic conceptualisation of the nature of evidence. Implications of a pluralistic perspective for research training and practice are discussed. Pluralistic inquiry that emphasises dialogue, collaboration, epistemic justice and the co-existence of multiple truths, creates opportunities for individuals, families and communities from a wide range of backgrounds to co-produce knowledge in ways that support their capacities for active citizenship and involvement in open democratic decision-making. To fulfil these possibilities, it is necessary for psychotherapy research to be oriented towards social goals that are sufficiently relevant to both researchers and co-participants to harness their passion and work together for a common good.

Indexed as

dialogueepistemic (in)justicepluralismpsychotherapy researchsocial relevance

Identifiers

PMID34552542
PMCPMC8450328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.