ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Predicting Success of a Digital Self-Help Intervention for Alcohol and Substance Use With Machine Learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06739304 (The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Dropout and Influencing Factors in Digital Psychosocial Intervention Trials for Adult Illicit Substance Users: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation and Future Challenges in a Self-Guided Web-Based Intervention With and Without Chat Support for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2024Trial
- Predicting individual differences in digital alcohol intervention effectiveness through multimodal data.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Leveraging Machine Learning to Advance Alcohol Research: Current Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2026Review
- Evaluating community resilience through social media during China's first post-COVID-19 reopening: insights from machine learning.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Discovering what young adults want in electronic interventions aimed at reducing alcohol-related consequences.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluating the impact of motivational interviewing on engagement and outcomes in a web-based self-help intervention for gambling disorder: A randomised controlled trial.Internet interventions · 2024Article
- Predicting Adherence to Behavior Change Support Systems Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review.JMIR AI · 2023Review
- Key Risk Factors Associated With Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Use Among Adolescents.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Article
- Preferences of young adults on the development of a new digital add-on alcohol intervention for depression treatment: A qualitative study.Internet interventions · 2023Article
- Predictors of smoking cessation outcomes identified by machine learning: A systematic review.Addiction neuroscience · 2023Article
- Can a Single Variable Predict Early Dropout From Digital Health Interventions? Comparison of Predictive Models From Two Large Randomized Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital self-help interventions for reducing the use of alcohol tobacco and other drugs (ATOD) have generally shown positive but small effects in controlling substance use and improving the quality of life of participants. Nonetheless, low adherence rates remain a major drawback of these digital interventions, with mixed results in (prolonged) participation and outcome. To prevent non-adherence, we developed models to predict success in the early stages of an ATOD digital self-help intervention and explore the predictors associated with participant's goal achievement.
methodsWe included previous and current participants from a widely used, evidence-based ATOD intervention from the Netherlands (Jellinek Digital Self-help). Participants were considered successful if they completed all intervention modules and reached their substance use goals (i.e., stop/reduce). Early dropout was defined as finishing only the first module. During model development, participants were split per substance (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis) and features were computed based on the log data of the first 3 days of intervention participation. Machine learning models were trained, validated and tested using a nested k-fold cross-validation strategy.
resultsFrom the 32,398 participants enrolled in the study, 80% of participants did not complete the first module of the intervention and were excluded from further analysis. From the remaining participants, the percentage of success for each substance was 30% for alcohol, 22% for cannabis and 24% for tobacco. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was the highest for the Random Forest model trained on data from the alcohol and tobacco programs (0.71 95%CI 0.69-0.73) and (0.71 95%CI 0.67-0.76), respectively, followed by cannabis (0.67 95%CI 0.59-0.75). Quitting substance use instead of moderation as an intervention goal, initial daily consumption, no substance use on the weekends as a target goal and intervention engagement were strong predictors of success. DISCUSSION: Using log data from the first 3 days of intervention use, machine learning models showed positive results in identifying successful participants. Our results suggest the models were especially able to identify participants at risk of early dropout. Multiple variables were found to have high predictive value, which can be used to further improve the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.