Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552539›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Predicting Success of a Digital Self-Help Intervention for Alcohol and Substance Use With Machine Learning.

Lucas A Ramos, Matthijs Blankers, Guido van Wingen, Tamara de Bruijn, Steffen C Pauws, Anneke E Goudriaan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06739304 (The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06739304 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSir Run Run Shaw HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled1,200ConditionsSubstance Use DisorderArmsMindfulness-based Relapse Prevention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas A RamosDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Matthijs BlankersDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Guido van WingenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tamara de BruijnJellinek Prevention, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Steffen C PauwsDepartment of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Anneke E GoudriaanDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Arkin · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLJellinek · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital self-help interventions for reducing the use of alcohol tobacco and other drugs (ATOD) have generally shown positive but small effects in controlling substance use and improving the quality of life of participants. Nonetheless, low adherence rates remain a major drawback of these digital interventions, with mixed results in (prolonged) participation and outcome. To prevent non-adherence, we developed models to predict success in the early stages of an ATOD digital self-help intervention and explore the predictors associated with participant's goal achievement.

methodsWe included previous and current participants from a widely used, evidence-based ATOD intervention from the Netherlands (Jellinek Digital Self-help). Participants were considered successful if they completed all intervention modules and reached their substance use goals (i.e., stop/reduce). Early dropout was defined as finishing only the first module. During model development, participants were split per substance (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis) and features were computed based on the log data of the first 3 days of intervention participation. Machine learning models were trained, validated and tested using a nested k-fold cross-validation strategy.

resultsFrom the 32,398 participants enrolled in the study, 80% of participants did not complete the first module of the intervention and were excluded from further analysis. From the remaining participants, the percentage of success for each substance was 30% for alcohol, 22% for cannabis and 24% for tobacco. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was the highest for the Random Forest model trained on data from the alcohol and tobacco programs (0.71 95%CI 0.69-0.73) and (0.71 95%CI 0.67-0.76), respectively, followed by cannabis (0.67 95%CI 0.59-0.75). Quitting substance use instead of moderation as an intervention goal, initial daily consumption, no substance use on the weekends as a target goal and intervention engagement were strong predictors of success. DISCUSSION: Using log data from the first 3 days of intervention use, machine learning models showed positive results in identifying successful participants. Our results suggest the models were especially able to identify participants at risk of early dropout. Multiple variables were found to have high predictive value, which can be used to further improve the intervention.

Indexed as

addictionATODCBTeHealthlog data analysismachine learningSubstance Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID34552539
PMCPMC8451420
OpenAlexW3197619542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.