Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552513›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Risk and Protective Factors for Personality Disorders: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses of Case-Control and Cohort Studies.

Marco Solmi, Elena Dragioti, Giovanni Croatto, Joaquim Radua, Stefan Borgwardt, Andre F Carvalho, Jacopo Demurtas, Anna Mosina, Peter Kurotschka, Trevor Thompson and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence-based atlas.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Marco SolmiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Elena DragiotiPain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Giovanni CroattoNeurosciences Department, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Joaquim RaduaEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, London, United Kingdom.
Stefan BorgwardtDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andre F CarvalhoDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jacopo DemurtasClinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Anna MosinaClienia AG, Wetzikon Psychiatric Centre, Wetzikon, Switzerland.
Peter KurotschkaDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Trevor ThompsonFaculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom.
Samuele CorteseFaculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, Center for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jae Il ShinDepartment of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Paolo Fusar-PoliEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, London, United Kingdom.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAClienia AGConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESLinköping University · SESolent NHS Trust · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Greenwich · GBUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Padua · ITYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The putative risk/protective factors for several personality disorders remain unclear. The vast majority of published studies has assessed personality characteristics/traits rather than disorders. Thus, the current umbrella review of meta-analyses (MAs) aims to systematically assess risk or protective factors associated with personality disorders. We searched PubMed-MEDLINE/PsycInfo databases, up to August 31, 2020. Quality of MAs was assessed with AMSTAR-2, while the credibility of evidence for each association was assessed through standard quantitative criteria. Out of 571 initial references, five meta-analyses met inclusion criteria, encompassing 56 associations of 26 potential environmental factors for antisocial, dependent, borderline personality disorder, with a median of five studies per association, and median 214 cases per association. Overall, 35 (62.5%) of the associations were nominally significant. Six associations met class II (i.e., highly suggestive) evidence for borderline personality disorder, with large effect sizes involving childhood emotional abuse (OR = 28.15, 95% CI 14.76-53.68), childhood emotional neglect (OR = 22.86, 95% CI 11.55-45.22), childhood any adversities (OR = 14.32, 95% CI 10.80-18.98), childhood physical abuse (OR = 9.30, 95% CI 6.57-13.17), childhood sexual abuse (OR = 7.95, 95% CI 6.21-10.17), and childhood physical neglect (OR = 5.73, 95% CI 3.21-10.21), plus 16 further associations supported by class IV evidence. No risk factor for antisocial or dependent personality disorder was supported by class I, II, and III, but six and seven met class IV evidence, respectively. Quality of included meta-analyses was rated as moderate in two, critically low in three. The large effect sizes found for a broad range of childhood adversities suggest that prevention of personality disorders should target childhood-related risk factors. However, larger cohort studies assessing multidimensional risk factors are needed in the field.

Indexed as

mental healthmeta-analysispersonality disorderpreventionpsychiatryrisk factorsystematic reviewumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID34552513
PMCPMC8450571
OpenAlexW3195528067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.