Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552484›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

A Synthetic Hydrogel, VitroGel

Michelle D Cherne, Barkan Sidar, T Andrew Sebrell, Humberto S Sanchez, Kody Heaton, Francis J Kassama, Mandi M Roe, Andrew B Gentry, Connie B Chang, Seth T Walk and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Physical, chemical, and structural properties of human gastric organoid-derived mucus.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Use of Organoid Cultures in Advancing Nutrition Research.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle D CherneDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Barkan SidarChemical and Biological Engineering Department and Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
T Andrew SebrellDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Humberto S SanchezChemical and Biological Engineering Department and Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Kody HeatonDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Francis J KassamaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, United States.
Mandi M RoeDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Andrew B GentryBozeman GI Clinic, Deaconess Hospital, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Connie B ChangChemical and Biological Engineering Department and Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Seth T WalkDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Mark JutilaDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
James N WilkingChemical and Biological Engineering Department and Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Diane BimczokDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Montana State University · USBowdoin College · USBozeman Health Deaconess Hospital · US

Funding

Using the GoFlowChip to understand SARS-CoV-2 infection of the gastrointestinal mucosa of humans and batsU01EB029242 · NIBIB · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI BIMCZOK, DIANE, WALK, SETH T · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
Modeling gastric mucus layer physiologyR01GM131408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FOGELSON, AARON L · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB029242NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunosurveillance of the gastrointestinal epithelium by mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs) is essential for maintaining gut health. However, studying the complex interplay between the human gastrointestinal epithelium and MNPs such as dendritic cells (DCs) is difficult, since traditional cell culture systems lack complexity, and animal models may not adequately represent human tissues. Microphysiological systems, or tissue chips, are an attractive alternative for these investigations, because they model functional features of specific tissues or organs using microscale culture platforms that recreate physiological tissue microenvironments. However, successful integration of multiple of tissue types on a tissue chip platform to reproduce physiological cell-cell interactions remains a challenge. We previously developed a tissue chip system, the gut organoid flow chip (GOFlowChip), for long term culture of 3-D pluripotent stem cell-derived human intestinal organoids. Here, we optimized the GOFlowChip platform to build a complex microphysiological immune-cell-epithelial cell co-culture model in order to study DC-epithelial interactions in human stomach. We first tested different tubing materials and chip configurations to optimize DC loading onto the GOFlowChip and demonstrated that DC culture on the GOFlowChip for up to 20 h did not impact DC activation status or viability. However, Transwell chemotaxis assays and live confocal imaging revealed that Matrigel, the extracellular matrix (ECM) material commonly used for organoid culture, prevented DC migration towards the organoids and the establishment of direct MNP-epithelial contacts. Therefore, we next evaluated DC chemotaxis through alternative ECM materials including Matrigel-collagen mixtures and synthetic hydrogels. A polysaccharide-based synthetic hydrogel, VitroGel®-ORGANOID-3 (V-ORG-3), enabled significantly increased DC chemotaxis through the matrix, supported organoid survival and growth, and did not significantly alter DC activation or viability. On the GOFlowChip, DCs that were flowed into the chip migrated rapidly through the V-ORG matrix and reached organoids embedded deep within the chip, with increased interactions between DCs and gastric organoids. The successful integration of DCs and V-ORG-3 embedded gastric organoids into the GOFlowChip platform now permits real-time imaging of MNP-epithelial interactions and other investigations of the complex interplay between gastrointestinal MNPs and epithelial cells in their response to pathogens, candidate drugs and mucosal vaccines.

Indexed as

chemotaxisdendritic cellgastric organoidhydrogelmatrigelmicrophysiological systemmononuclear phagocyte

Identifiers

PMID34552484
PMCPMC8450338
OpenAlexW3198681453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.