Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552448›Full record

ArticleThe journal for nurse practitioners : JNP2020

Differences in Evaluating Fall Risk by Primary Care Provider Type.

Janice A Mark, Yara K Haddad, Elizabeth R Burns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janice A MarkCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Injury Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS S106-9, Atlanta, GA, USA 30341.
Yara K HaddadCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Injury Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS S106-9, Atlanta, GA, USA 30341.
Elizabeth R BurnsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Injury Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS S106-9, Atlanta, GA, USA 30341.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999OSELS CDC HHS U50 OE000009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed differences in clinical fall risk assessment of older adults (65+) and clinical resources used by primary care providers (PCP). We used Porter Novelli's 2016 DocStyles survey to examine clinical behavior data from PCPs (n=1128). Compared to other practitioners, nurse practitioners (NP) reported a higher percentage of their patients were older adults. The majority of NPs reported screening for falls risk routinely, but most did not use standardized fall-risk assessments to assess risk factors. There were also differences in the types of clinical resources used by NPs and other PCPs to evaluate the safety profile of medications.

Indexed as

elderlyfall screeningmedication assessmentnurse practitionersolder adultsprimary care providers

Identifiers

PMID34552448
PMCPMC8455152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.