ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal
Hip Arthroscopy Prior to Periacetabular Osteotomy Does Not Increase Operative Time or Complications: A Single Center Experience.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia: a systematic review.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established procedure to improve function and reduce pain in the non-arthritic dysplastic hip. PAO and hip arthroscopy are often performed together; however, there is concern that hip arthroscopy increases difficulty of PAO due to arthroscopic fluid extravasation. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of performing hip arthroscopy prior to PAO under the same anesthetic on PAO operative time and postoperative complications.
methodsA retrospective review of all PAO cases during a two-year period at a single academic institution was performed. Cases were stratified into two groups based on whether concomitant hip arthroscopy was performed. In the combined hip arthroscopy and PAO group, hip arthroscopy was performed prior to PAO under the same general anesthetic in all cases. Student t-test was utilized to compare the operative times between the two study groups and Chi Square was used to compare categorical variables.
resultsDuring the two-year study period, 93 total PAO cases in 86 patients (mean age: 23.5 + 8.7 years; 81.4% female) were performed. Of these, 67 PAO surgeries (72.0%) were performed following hip arthroscopy. The total complication rate was 2.2% with one postoperative complication occurring in each group. There was no difference in mean PAO operative time between the two study groups (PAO: 127.6 + 18.0 minutes; PAO with hip arthroscopy: 125.4 + 16.8 minutes; p=0.570).
conclusionPerforming hip arthroscopy prior to PAO under the same general anesthetic does not significantly increase PAO operative time or postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34552414PMC8259174W3200307677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.