Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552412›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal

Weightbearing Computed Tomography for Assessment of Foot and Ankle Deformities: The Iowa Experience.

Edward O Rojas, Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur, Kevin Dibbern, Matthieu Lalevee, Elijah Auch, Eli Schmidt, Victoria Vivtcharenko, Shuyuan Li, Phinit Phisitkul, John Femino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Hindfoot alignment assessment by the foot-ankle offset: a diagnostic study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward O RojasDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Nacime Salomao Barbachan MansurDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Kevin DibbernDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Matthieu LaleveeDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Elijah AuchDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Eli SchmidtDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Victoria VivtcharenkoDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Shuyuan LiDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Phinit PhisitkulTri-State Specialists, Sioux City, IA, USA.
John FeminoDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Cesar de Cesar NettoDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) is a reliable and precise modality for the measurement and analysis of bone position in the foot and ankle, as well as associated deformities. WBCT to assess three dimensional relationships among bones allowed the development of new measurements, as the Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO), which has high inter and intra-rater reliability. This study reports the University of Iowa's experience utilizing WBCT for the care of foot and ankle patients by describing its utility across different orthopedic diseases in improving diagnostic assessment, aiding surgical planning, and expanding the use for objective clinical follow-up.

methodsThe medical records of consecutive patients with various foot and ankle disorders that underwent WBCT examination as part of the standard of care at a single institution between November 2014 and August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient factors, including body mass index (BMI), sex, and patient comorbidities were collected. 3D coordinates for calculation of FAO were harvested using the Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) views were calculated from the obtained exams. Descriptive statistics were performed with Shapiro-Wilk test and the Anderson-Darling tests.

results1175 feet and ankles (820 patients) had a WBCT performed over the studied 68 months. 53% of the subjects were male and 47% female. 588 of the acquisitions were from the right side (50.04%) and 587 from the left side (49.96%). Diabetes was present in 15.47% of, Rheumatic diagnoses in 4.52% and smoking habits in 44.10% of patients. Mean BMI of the sample was found to be 32.47 (32.03-32.90, 95% CI). The mean Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) encountered in the study's population was 2.43 (2.05-2.82, 95% CI; min -30.8, max 37.65; median 2.39).

conclusionThis study contains the largest cohort of WBCTs with accompanied FAO measurements to date, which can aid with establishing a new baseline FAO measurement for multiple pathological conditions. Acquiring WBCTs resulted in a variety of more specific diagnoses for patient with foot and ankle complaints. The ability to utilize WBCT for presurgical planning, the capability to provide a 3D reconstruction of patient anatomy, and its use for assessment of advanced relational foot and ankle measurements, such as FAO, demonstrate how WBCT may serve as a remarkable utility in clinical practice and has become a standard of care in our practice at the University of Iowa.

Indexed as

AnkleTomography, X-Ray ComputedFemaleHumansIowaMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesWeight-Bearingfoot ankle offsetweight-bearing ct

Identifiers

PMID34552412
PMCPMC8259196
OpenAlexW3201470606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.