ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal
Weightbearing Computed Tomography for Assessment of Foot and Ankle Deformities: The Iowa Experience.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Position-Dependent Stability of an Unconstrained Total Talar Replacement and Its Suture Reinforcement: A Human Cadaveric Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Morphologic Analysis of Foot Deformities Using Weightbearing CT and Semiautomated Segmentation Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Automated 3-Dimensional Measurements of First Metatarsal Dysplasia in Hallux Valgus.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Weightbearing Computed Tomography Reveals Why Heel Varus Is Not Always the Rule in Müller-Weiss Disease.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography in the Assessment and Management of Charcot Foot Deformity: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Diagnosis, Treatment, and Potential Complications of Triplane Ankle Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Weightbearing Computed Tomography Measurements in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: A Contemporary Review.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Trends in the Use of Weightbearing Computed Tomography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip & pelvis · 2024Review
- Hindfoot alignment assessment by the foot-ankle offset: a diagnostic study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Ankle osteoarthritis: comprehensive review and treatment algorithm proposal.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
- Deformity Correction in Ankle Osteoarthritis Using a Lateral Trans-Fibular Total Ankle Replacement: A Weight-Bearing CT Assessment.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWeightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) is a reliable and precise modality for the measurement and analysis of bone position in the foot and ankle, as well as associated deformities. WBCT to assess three dimensional relationships among bones allowed the development of new measurements, as the Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO), which has high inter and intra-rater reliability. This study reports the University of Iowa's experience utilizing WBCT for the care of foot and ankle patients by describing its utility across different orthopedic diseases in improving diagnostic assessment, aiding surgical planning, and expanding the use for objective clinical follow-up.
methodsThe medical records of consecutive patients with various foot and ankle disorders that underwent WBCT examination as part of the standard of care at a single institution between November 2014 and August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient factors, including body mass index (BMI), sex, and patient comorbidities were collected. 3D coordinates for calculation of FAO were harvested using the Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) views were calculated from the obtained exams. Descriptive statistics were performed with Shapiro-Wilk test and the Anderson-Darling tests.
results1175 feet and ankles (820 patients) had a WBCT performed over the studied 68 months. 53% of the subjects were male and 47% female. 588 of the acquisitions were from the right side (50.04%) and 587 from the left side (49.96%). Diabetes was present in 15.47% of, Rheumatic diagnoses in 4.52% and smoking habits in 44.10% of patients. Mean BMI of the sample was found to be 32.47 (32.03-32.90, 95% CI). The mean Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) encountered in the study's population was 2.43 (2.05-2.82, 95% CI; min -30.8, max 37.65; median 2.39).
conclusionThis study contains the largest cohort of WBCTs with accompanied FAO measurements to date, which can aid with establishing a new baseline FAO measurement for multiple pathological conditions. Acquiring WBCTs resulted in a variety of more specific diagnoses for patient with foot and ankle complaints. The ability to utilize WBCT for presurgical planning, the capability to provide a 3D reconstruction of patient anatomy, and its use for assessment of advanced relational foot and ankle measurements, such as FAO, demonstrate how WBCT may serve as a remarkable utility in clinical practice and has become a standard of care in our practice at the University of Iowa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34552412PMC8259196W3201470606What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.