Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552411›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal

The Rotational Positioning of the Bones in the Medial Column of the Foot: A Weightbearing CT Analysis.

Eli Schmidt, Thiago Silva, Daniel Baumfeld, Kevin N Dibbern, Hee Young Lee, John Femino, Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur, Cesar de Cesar Netto

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eli SchmidtDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Thiago SilvaFederal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Daniel BaumfeldFederal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Kevin N DibbernDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Hee Young LeeDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
John FeminoDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Nacime Salomao Barbachan MansurDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Cesar de Cesar NettoDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalrotation of medial column bones of the foot has been advocated as an important factor in foot conditions such as hallux valgus and progressive collapsing foot deformity. Although stated as a deformity component, variances of normality in the general population are not completely understood. This study intended to describe the rotational profile of all medial column bones using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) images in a cohort of patients with different foot and ankle problems.

methodsIn this retrospective study, 110 feet of 95 consecutive patients that received a WBCT for assessment of different foot and ankle pathologies were included. Measurements were performed by a blinded fellowship-trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon. Rotation of the navicular, medial cuneiform, proximal and distal first metatarsal as well as proximal phalanx of the first toe were recorded. Positive values were considered pronation and negative values were considered supination. Rotational profile of each bone/ segment was assessed by ANOVA and comparison between each segment was performed using Wilcoxon Each-Pair analysis. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

resultsOn average, a rotational positioning in pronation (internal rotation) was observed for all medial column bones. The navicular (43.2°, CI 41.1°-45.3°) and the proximal metatarsal (33.9°, CI 31.8°-36.0°) showed the highest mean rotation values. The medial cuneiform presented the lowest mean pronation (6.1°, CI 4.0°-8.3°). Comparison between each bone segment demonstrated statistically significant differences of rotational alignment for the different bones (p<0.0001), with the exception of the distal metatarsal and proximal phalanx, that had similar amounts of pronation. A zig-zag rotational pattern of alignment was observed from proximal to distal, with relative supination/pronation of adjacent medial column bones.

conclusionThe overall rotational profile of medial column bones was found to be in absolute pronation, most pronounced at the navicular and proximal first metatarsal, with significant differences in the amount of pronation when comparing most of the medial column bones. The presented data may be utilized as reference/ baseline values of medial column rotation, supporting future prospective, comparative and controlled studies.

Indexed as

Hallux ValgusMetatarsal BonesHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedWeight-Bearingflatfoothallux valgusmedial columnprogressive collapsing foot deformitypronationrotationrotational deformityWBCT

Identifiers

PMID34552411
PMCPMC8259195
OpenAlexW3201218299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.