ArticleSafety science2020
Inclination angles during cross-slope roof walking.
Article in Safety science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatiotemporal gait parameters while cross-slope residential roof walking.International journal of industrial ergonomics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Residential roofers have the highest rate of falls in the construction sector with injuries and fatalities costing billions of dollars annually. The sloped roof surface is the most predominant component within the residential roof work environment. Postural stability on a sloped work environment is not well studied. Calculating inclination angles (IAs) using the lateral ankle marker could be a quality measure to determine how cross-slope roof walking will influence stability. Will cross-slope roof-walking effect anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) IAs in adult males? Eleven adult males participated in two testing sessions-level and cross-slope roof gait session on a 6/12 pitched roof segment. Changes in AP and ML IAs between conditions were compared at: heel strike (HS) and toe off (TO). Legs were analyzed separately due to the cross-slope walking. The left foot was 'higher' on the sloped roof and the right was 'lower.' Significant increases (p ≤ 0.006) in IAs were observed due to the sloped roof in all conditions except the AP 'lower' leg (p = 0.136). Increases in IA suggest a decrease in postural stability as the body will result in greater sway compared to a natural posture. Increases in AP IAs may cause slipping in the anterior or posterior direction as the normal force will decrease during HS and TO. In the ML direction, fall risk is increased and more stress is placed on the hip abductors in order to reduce falling. Thus traversing a sloped roof surface reduces stability of healthy workers and escalates injury/fall risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.