Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552136›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Computing molecular excited states on a D-Wave quantum annealer.

Alexander Teplukhin, Brian K Kendrick, Susan M Mniszewski, Yu Zhang, Ashutosh Kumar, Christian F A Negre, Petr M Anisimov, Sergei Tretiak, Pavel A Dub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander TeplukhinTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Brian K KendrickTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Susan M MniszewskiComputer, Computational and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Yu ZhangTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Ashutosh KumarTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Christian F A NegreTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Petr M AnisimovAccelerator Operations and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Sergei TretiakTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. serg@lanl.gov.
Pavel A DubChemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. pdub@lanl.gov.

Funding

Laboratory Directed Research and Development 20200056DR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possibility of using quantum computers for electronic structure calculations has opened up a promising avenue for computational chemistry. Towards this direction, numerous algorithmic advances have been made in the last five years. The potential of quantum annealers, which are the prototypes of adiabatic quantum computers, is yet to be fully explored. In this work, we demonstrate the use of a D-Wave quantum annealer for the calculation of excited electronic states of molecular systems. These simulations play an important role in a number of areas, such as photovoltaics, semiconductor technology and nanoscience. The excited states are treated using two methods, time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) and time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT), both within a commonly used Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA). The resulting TDA eigenvalue equations are solved on a D-Wave quantum annealer using the Quantum Annealer Eigensolver (QAE), developed previously. The method is shown to reproduce a typical basis set convergence on the example [Formula: see text] molecule and is also applied to several other molecular species. Characteristic properties such as transition dipole moments and oscillator strengths are computed as well. Three potential energy profiles for excited states are computed for [Formula: see text] as a function of the molecular geometry. Similar to previous studies, the accuracy of the method is dependent on the accuracy of the intermediate meta-heuristic software called qbsolv.

Identifiers

PMID34552136
PMCPMC8458378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.