Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552071›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Systems approaches identify the consequences of monosomy in somatic human cells.

Narendra Kumar Chunduri, Paul Menges, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Angela Wieland, Vincent Leon Gotsmann, Balca R Mardin, Christopher Buccitelli, Jan O Korbel, Felix Willmund, Maik Kschischo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Hallmarks of Aneuploidy in Cancer and Congenital Syndromes.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Generation of Monosomy 21q Human iPS Cells by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Interstitial Megabase Deletion.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A survey of chromosomal instability measures across mechanistic models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Narendra Kumar ChunduriDepartment of Molecular Genetics, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9875-2264
Paul MengesDepartment of Molecular Genetics, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Xiaoxiao ZhangUniversity of Applied Sciences Koblenz, Remagen, Germany.
Angela WielandDepartment of Molecular Genetics, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Vincent Leon GotsmannGroup Genetics of Eukaryotes, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Balca R MardinGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3903-9354
Christopher BuccitelliGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan O KorbelGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2798-3794
Felix WillmundGroup Genetics of Eukaryotes, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3988-4590
Maik KschischoUniversity of Applied Sciences Koblenz, Remagen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3977-9982
Markus RaeschleDepartment of Molecular Genetics, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Zuzana StorchovaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany. storchova@bio.uni-kl.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2376-7047
University of Kaiserslautern · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEKoblenz University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome loss that results in monosomy is detrimental to viability, yet it is frequently observed in cancers. How cancers survive with monosomy is unknown. Using p53-deficient monosomic cell lines, we find that chromosome loss impairs proliferation and genomic stability. Transcriptome and proteome analysis demonstrates reduced expression of genes encoded on the monosomes, which is partially compensated in some cases. Monosomy also induces global changes in gene expression. Pathway enrichment analysis reveals that genes involved in ribosome biogenesis and translation are downregulated in all monosomic cells analyzed. Consistently, monosomies display defects in protein synthesis and ribosome assembly. We further show that monosomies are incompatible with p53 expression, likely due to defects in ribosome biogenesis. Accordingly, impaired ribosome biogenesis and p53 inactivation are associated with monosomy in cancer. Our systematic study of monosomy in human cells explains why monosomy is so detrimental and reveals the importance of p53 for monosomy occurrence in cancer.

Indexed as

Cell LineCell ProliferationCell SurvivalGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationGenome, HumanGenomic InstabilityHumansMonosomyNeoplasmsProtein BiosynthesisRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ribosomal ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID34552071
PMCPMC8458293
OpenAlexW3201129077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.