Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34552002›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2021

Reading Proficiency Trends Following Newborn Hearing Screening Implementation.

Christine Yoshinaga-Itano, Craig A Mason, Mallene Wiggin, Scott D Grosse, Marcus Gaffney, Phillip M Gilley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hearing and early life adversity: effects of developmental stress on sensory processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Worldwide Burden of Hearing Loss Across Childhood and Adolescence, 1990-2021, and Projection to 2050.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deaf role-models for Deaf children in hearing families: a scoping review.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Genetics of pediatric hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  11. Barriers to Equity in Pediatric Hearing Health Care: A Review of the Evidence.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine Yoshinaga-ItanoInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado christie.yoshi@colorado.edu.
Craig A MasonSchool of Learning and Teaching, The University of Maine, Orono, Maine.
Mallene WigginInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Scott D GrosseCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Marcus GaffneyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Phillip M GilleyInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.

Funding

Coordinating Center for Research to Promote the Health of Children with Birth Defects and People with Developmental and Other DisabilitiesU19DD001218 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI CAI, BO, CARLIN, ROBERTA · 2017 to 2021
$7.4M
ACL HHS U19DD001218Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U19 DD001218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate trends in population-level school-aged reading scores among students with hearing loss in an urban Colorado school district after implementation of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.

methodsThe final sample included 1422 assessments conducted during the 2000-2001 through 2013-2014 school years for 321 children with hearing loss in grades 3 through 10. Longitudinal hierarchical linear modeling analyses were used to examine reading proficiency (controlling for birth year, grade in school, free and reduced lunch status, additional disability services, and English not spoken in the home). The Colorado Student Assessment Program was administered to students in third through 10th grades throughout the state. The test years chosen included children born before and after implementation of UNHS.

resultsAfter implementation of UNHS, significant longitudinal reading proficiency improvements were observed by birth year and grade overall and for all subgroups. However, gains in reading proficiency were substantially less for children eligible for free and reduced lunch and those with moderate-severe to profound hearing loss. With each succeeding birth cohort and grade, increased numbers of children participated in testing because of improved language skills, with higher proportions identified as proficient or advanced readers.

conclusionsNotable improvements in reading proficiency after Early Hearing Detection and Intervention implementation were demonstrated, as all groups of children with hearing loss became more likely to achieve proficient and advanced reading levels. On the other hand, some disparities increased, with greater improvements in reading proficiency for children in economically advantaged families.

Indexed as

Hearing DisordersHearing TestsNeonatal ScreeningReadingAdolescentChildCohort StudiesColoradoHumansInfant, NewbornLanguage DevelopmentLiteracy

Identifiers

PMID34552002
PMCPMC9109733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.