ArticleCancer research2021
Computational Analysis of Cholangiocarcinoma Phosphoproteomes Identifies Patient-Specific Drug Targets.
Article in Cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and personalised medicine in liver cancer.Journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Functional proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling of routine FFPE CNS tumor tissue complements genomic and epigenomic characterization.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- Conserved Phosphoprotein Networks Identify Actionable Adhesion/Wnt and Metallothionein Modules in Cholangiocarcinoma.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrative Sequencing and Proteogenomic Approaches to Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for Precision Diagnosis and Therapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- FGFR Aberrations in Solid Tumors: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Translation of Targeted Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio as a novel inflammatory biomarker: Validation and clinical relevance as an independent prognostic factor in cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- ERK1/2 Signaling in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: From Preclinical Advances to Therapeutic Strategies.Biology · 2025Review
- Immunotherapy in biliary tract cancer: reshaping the tumour microenvironment and advancing precision combination strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Construction of an ER stress-related prognostic signature for predicting prognosis and screening the effective anti-tumor drug in osteosarcoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Application of AI on cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- [Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 6 Ameliorates Podocyte Injury in Diabetic Kidney Disease in Mice].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023Article
- Deep Learning in Phosphoproteomics: Methods and Application in Cancer Drug Discovery.Proteomes · 2023Review
- Principles of phosphoproteomics and applications in cancer research.The Biochemical journal · 2023Article
- Elucidating the causal association between gut microbiota and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma through Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Temporal dynamics from phosphoproteomics using endoscopic biopsy specimens provides new therapeutic targets in stage IV gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a form of hepatobiliary cancer with an abysmal prognosis. Despite advances in our understanding of cholangiocarcinoma pathophysiology and its genomic landscape, targeted therapies have not yet made a significant impact on its clinical management. The low response rates of targeted therapies in cholangiocarcinoma suggest that patient heterogeneity contributes to poor clinical outcome. Here we used mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics and computational methods to identify patient-specific drug targets in patient tumors and cholangiocarcinoma-derived cell lines. We analyzed 13 primary tumors of patients with cholangiocarcinoma with matched nonmalignant tissue and 7 different cholangiocarcinoma cell lines, leading to the identification and quantification of more than 13,000 phosphorylation sites. The phosphoproteomes of cholangiocarcinoma cell lines and patient tumors were significantly correlated. MEK1, KIT, ERK1/2, and several cyclin-dependent kinases were among the protein kinases most frequently showing increased activity in cholangiocarcinoma relative to nonmalignant tissue. Application of the Drug Ranking Using Machine Learning (DRUML) algorithm selected inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC; belinostat and CAY10603) and PI3K pathway members as high-ranking therapies to use in primary cholangiocarcinoma. The accuracy of the computational drug rankings based on predicted responses was confirmed in cell-line models of cholangiocarcinoma. Together, this study uncovers frequently activated biochemical pathways in cholangiocarcinoma and provides a proof of concept for the application of computational methodology to rank drugs based on efficacy in individual patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Phosphoproteomic and computational analyses identify patient-specific drug targets in cholangiocarcinoma, supporting the potential of a machine learning method to predict personalized therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.