Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551960›Full record

ArticleCancer research2021

Computational Analysis of Cholangiocarcinoma Phosphoproteomes Identifies Patient-Specific Drug Targets.

Shirin Elizabeth Khorsandi, Arran D Dokal, Vinothini Rajeeve, David J Britton, Megan S Illingworth, Nigel Heaton, Pedro R Cutillas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Application of AI on cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. [Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 6 Ameliorates Podocyte Injury in Diabetic Kidney Disease in Mice].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shirin Elizabeth KhorsandiInstitute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. p.cutillas@qmul.ac.uk shirin.khorsandi@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-4467
Arran D DokalCell Signaling & Proteomics Group, Centre for Genomics & Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Vinothini RajeeveCell Signaling & Proteomics Group, Centre for Genomics & Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6361-4291
David J BrittonCell Signaling & Proteomics Group, Centre for Genomics & Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Megan S IllingworthThe Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, United Kingdom.
Nigel HeatonInstitute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Pedro R CutillasCell Signaling & Proteomics Group, Centre for Genomics & Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. p.cutillas@qmul.ac.uk shirin.khorsandi@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3426-2274
Queen Mary University of London · GBKing's College - North Carolina · USKing's College London · GBTuring Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma is a form of hepatobiliary cancer with an abysmal prognosis. Despite advances in our understanding of cholangiocarcinoma pathophysiology and its genomic landscape, targeted therapies have not yet made a significant impact on its clinical management. The low response rates of targeted therapies in cholangiocarcinoma suggest that patient heterogeneity contributes to poor clinical outcome. Here we used mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics and computational methods to identify patient-specific drug targets in patient tumors and cholangiocarcinoma-derived cell lines. We analyzed 13 primary tumors of patients with cholangiocarcinoma with matched nonmalignant tissue and 7 different cholangiocarcinoma cell lines, leading to the identification and quantification of more than 13,000 phosphorylation sites. The phosphoproteomes of cholangiocarcinoma cell lines and patient tumors were significantly correlated. MEK1, KIT, ERK1/2, and several cyclin-dependent kinases were among the protein kinases most frequently showing increased activity in cholangiocarcinoma relative to nonmalignant tissue. Application of the Drug Ranking Using Machine Learning (DRUML) algorithm selected inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC; belinostat and CAY10603) and PI3K pathway members as high-ranking therapies to use in primary cholangiocarcinoma. The accuracy of the computational drug rankings based on predicted responses was confirmed in cell-line models of cholangiocarcinoma. Together, this study uncovers frequently activated biochemical pathways in cholangiocarcinoma and provides a proof of concept for the application of computational methodology to rank drugs based on efficacy in individual patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Phosphoproteomic and computational analyses identify patient-specific drug targets in cholangiocarcinoma, supporting the potential of a machine learning method to predict personalized therapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCholangiocarcinomaComputational BiologyDrug DiscoveryHumansPhosphoproteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesProteomeTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorPhosphoproteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesProteome

Identifiers

PMID34551960
PMCPMC9397618
OpenAlexW3199189014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.