Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551937›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Trial-to-Trial Variability of Spiking Delay Activity in Prefrontal Cortex Constrains Burst-Coding Models of Working Memory.

Daming Li, Christos Constantinidis, John D Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Timescales of learning in prefrontal cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daming LiDepartment of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.
Christos ConstantinidisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235.
John D MurrayDepartment of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 john.murray@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4115-8181

Funding

NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF TRAINING IN VISUAL COGNITIVE TASKSR01EY017077 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHRISTOS CONSTANTINIDIS · 2006 to 2026
$6.0M
Linking Large-Scale Dysconnectivity in Schizophrenia to Cortical Circuit Function at the Individual Level through Computational Modeling and Multimodal NeuroimagingR01MH112746 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MURRAY, JOHN DAVID · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017077NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark neuronal correlate of working memory (WM) is stimulus-selective spiking activity of neurons in PFC during mnemonic delays. These observations have motivated an influential computational modeling framework in which WM is supported by persistent activity. Recently, this framework has been challenged by arguments that observed persistent activity may be an artifact of trial-averaging, which potentially masks high variability of delay activity at the single-trial level. In an alternative scenario, WM delay activity could be encoded in bursts of selective neuronal firing which occur intermittently across trials. However, this alternative proposal has not been tested on single-neuron spike-train data. Here, we developed a framework for addressing this issue by characterizing the trial-to-trial variability of neuronal spiking quantified by Fano factor (FF). By building a doubly stochastic Poisson spiking model, we first demonstrated that the burst-coding proposal implies a significant increase in FF positively correlated with firing rate, and thus loss of stability across trials during the delay. Simulation of spiking cortical circuit WM models further confirmed that FF is a sensitive measure that can well dissociate distinct WM mechanisms. We then tested these predictions on datasets of single-neuron recordings from macaque PFC during three WM tasks. In sharp contrast to the burst-coding model predictions, we only found a small fraction of neurons showing increased WM-dependent burstiness, and stability across trials during delay was strengthened in empirical data. Therefore, reduced trial-to-trial variability during delay provides strong constraints on the contribution of single-neuron intermittent bursting to WM maintenance.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermPoisson DistributionPrefrontal CortexStochastic Processesburstingcomputational modelFano factorprefrontal cortexspike-train statisticsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34551937
PMCPMC8549532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.