Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551930›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2021

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.

Jason M Cuellar, Edward Nomoto, Ehsan Saadat, Anthony Ma, Patrick Hill, Michael Kropf, Todd H Lanman, Brian Perri, Khawar Siddique, Willis Wagner and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prospective same day discharge instrumented lumbar spine surgery - a forty patient consecutive series.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jason M CuellarCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Edward NomotoCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Ehsan SaadatCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Anthony MaCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Patrick HillCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Michael KropfCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Todd H LanmanCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Brian PerriCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Khawar SiddiqueCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Willis WagnerDivision of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles California.
Rajeev RaoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles California.
Albert WongCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Michael EngDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Stephen StephanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Neel AnandCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Hyun BaeCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.
Alexandre RasouliCedars-Sinai Spine Center, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe frequency and complexity of spinal surgery performed in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) is increasing. However, safety and efficacy data of most spinal procedures adapted to the ASC are sparse and have focused on anterior cervical surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day complication and readmission rates of anterior lumbar spine surgery performed in an ASC or inpatient setting.

methodsWe performed a retrospective comparative analysis of 226 consecutive anterior lumbar surgeries (283 levels treated) completed in an ASC (

resultsThe two study groups had similar baseline characteristics. While there was a trend toward fewer complications, reoperations, and readmissions for the ASC cohort, the differences were not statistically significant. There were 7 intraoperative complications (5.6% minor vascular injury) in the inpatient cohort and 0 in the ASC cohort. The overall 90-day postoperative complication rate was 5.6% for the inpatient cohort and 0.9% for the ASC cohort. The 90-day readmission rate was 1.9% in the ASC cohort and 1.6% in the inpatient cohort. The 90-day reoperation rate was 0.8% for the inpatient cohort and 0% in the ASC cohort. The average hospital stay was 2.3 ± 1.5 days for the inpatient cohort.

conclusionThe 90-day readmission rates were lower for outpatients than for inpatients, while the complication and reoperation rates were similar. Our results demonstrate that anterior lumbar procedures, including single-level and multilevel ALIF, ADR, and hybrid procedures, can be performed safely in an ASC. This has significant cost savings implications for the ASC setting.

Indexed as

ADRALIFambulatory surgery centeranterior lumbar interbody fusionASChybridinpatientlumbar disc replacementlumbar spine surgery

Identifiers

PMID34551930
PMCPMC8651185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.