Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551901›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Freedom within a cage: how patriarchal gender norms limit women's use of mobile phones in rural central India.

Kerry Scott, Aashaka Shinde, Osama Ummer, Shalini Yadav, Manjula Sharma, Nikita Purty, Anushree Jairath, Sara Chamberlain, Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kerry ScottDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA kscott26@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-9637
Aashaka ShindeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Osama UmmerBBC Media Action, New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-5328
Shalini YadavOxford Policy Management, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Manjula SharmaIndependent researcher, New Delhi, India.
Nikita PurtyOxford Policy Management, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Anushree JairathOxford Policy Management, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Sara ChamberlainBBC Media Action, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevreDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-7240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndia has one of the highest gender gaps in mobile phone access in the world. As employment opportunities, health messaging (mHealth), access to government entitlements, banking, civic participation and social engagement increasingly take place in the digital sphere, this gender gap risks further exacerbating women's disadvantage in Indian society. This study identifies the factors driving women's unequal use of phones in rural Madhya Pradesh, India.

methodsWe interviewed mothers of 1-year-old children (n=29) who reported that they had at least some access to a mobile phone. Whenever possible, we also spoke to their husbands (n=23) and extended family members (n=34) through interviews or family group discussions about the use of phones in their households, as well as their perspectives on gender and phone use more broadly. Our analysis involved comparing wife-husband pairs to assess differences in phone access and use, and thematic coding on the determinants of women's phone use using an iteratively developed conceptual framework.

resultsWhile respondents reported that women could use the phone without needing permission, this apparent 'freedom' existed in a context that severely constrained women's actual use, most directly through: (1) narrow expectations and desires around how women would use phones, (2) women's dependence on men for phone ownership and lower proximity to phones, (3) the poorer functionality of women's phones; (4) women's limited digital skills, and (5) time allocation constraints, wherein women had less leisure time and were subject to social norms that discouraged using a phone for leisure.

conclusionOur framework, presenting the distal and proximate determinants of women's phone use, enables more nuanced understanding of India's digital divide. Addressing these determinants is vital to shift from re-entrenching unequal gender relations to transforming them through digital technology.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneTelemedicineChildFemaleFreedomHumansIndiaInfantMaleRural Populationhealth education and promotionhealth policymaternal healthpublic Healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID34551901
PMCPMC8461288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.