Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551858›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2021

An Automated Electronic Screening Tool (DETECT) for the Detection of Potentially Irreversible Loss of Brain Function.

Anne Trabitzsch, Konrad Pleul, Kristian Barlinn, Volkmar Franz, Markus Dengl, Monica Götze, Andreas Güldner, Maria Eberlein-Gonska, Detlev Michael Albrecht, Christian Hugo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06293170 (Automated Screening for Clinically Ascertained Loss of Cerebral Functions in Patients With Severe Brain Damage - an Interventional Cluster Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06293170 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Automated Screening for Clinically Ascertained Loss of Cerebral Functions in Patients With Severe Brain Damage - an Interventional Cluster Randomized Trial (DETECT-IVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnische Universität DresdenRan2024 to 2026Enrolled4,800ConditionsIrreversible Loss of Brain Function (ILBF)ArmsDETECT, Conventional care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne TrabitzschSurgery Center, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden; German Organ Procurement Organization, DSO region east, Dresden; Department of Neurology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden; Institute of Neurosurgery, University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden; Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden; Department of Quality and Medical Risk Managementt, University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden; Medical Board, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden.
Konrad Pleul
Kristian Barlinn
Volkmar Franz
Markus Dengl
Monica Götze
Andreas Güldner
Maria Eberlein-Gonska
Detlev Michael Albrecht
Christian Hugo
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major reason for the low number of organ donors in Germany is a deficit in the recognition of patients who may have impending irreversible loss of brain function (ILBF) in hospitals capable of organ retrieval.

methodsWe used anonymized data from the German Organ Procurement Organization (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, DSO) to compare two 12-month periods (a reference period and an evaluation period) before and after the implementation of an electronic screening tool (DETECT) at the University Hospital Dresden (UKD) with four other university hospitals without tool implementation (comparative cohort). DETECT is intended to aid in the recognition of potentially impending ILBF. The study endpoints encompassed patients with potentially unrecognized ILBF, patients with recognized ILBF, organ donations performed, and reports to the DSO. Changes in absolute risk were compared with Breslow-Day tests.

results309 patients who died with primary or secondary brain lesions were identified in the UKD in the reference and evaluation periods (164 and 145 patients, respectively), and 1060 (529, 531) in the comparative cohort. In the UKD, the number of unrecognized cases of possibly impending ILBF was 14/164 (8.54%) in the reference period and 1/145 (0.69%) in the evaluation period, yielding an absolute reduction of 7.85% (95% confidence interval [--3.36; --12.33]); by contrast, in the comparative cohort, there was a 0.55% absolute increase between the two periods ([--2.21; 3.30]; p = 0.002 for the comparison between the two cohorts). Only minor differences in absolute risk change were seen with regard to the probability of recognized ILBF (7.09% [0.29; 13.88] vs. 2.42% [1.18; 6.01]; p = 0.234), organ donation (4.70% [--0.89; 10.28] vs. 0.55% [--2.17; 3.26]; p = 0.214), or reporting to the DSO (4.17% [--1.77; 10.11] vs. 2.22% [--1.44; 5.89; p = 0.447); these changes may have arisen by chance.

conclusionThese findings suggest that the use of DETECT can help to reduce the deficit in the recognition of patients with impending or manifest ILBF.

Indexed as

Brain DeathTissue and Organ ProcurementBrainElectronicsHospitals, UniversityHumans

Identifiers

PMID34551858
PMCPMC8743991
OpenAlexW3200391181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.