Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551825›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2021

Why morphology matters: the negative consequences of hasty descriptions of putative novelties in asexual ascomycetes.

Ondřej Koukol, Gregorio Delgado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Morphological and molecular detection of Hepatozoon species in amphibians and reptiles from Mato Grosso, Midwest Brazil.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Studies in mycology · 2024
    Article
  9. Fungal Planet description sheets: 1614-1696.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2024
    Article
  10. The genusStudies in mycology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ondřej KoukolDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic. ondrej.koukol@natur.cuni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-9640
Gregorio DelgadoEMLab P&K Houston, 10900 Brittmoore Park Dr. Suite G, Houston, TX, 77041, USA.

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy Institutional Support for Science and Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent progress in the discovery of fungal diversity has been enabled by intensive mycological surveys in centres of global biodiversity. Descriptions of new fungal species have been almost routinely based on phenotypic studies coupled with single or multigene phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequence data. However, high accessibility of sequencing services together with an increasing amount of available molecular data are providing easier and less critical support for taxonomic novelties without carefully studying the phenotype, particularly morphology. As a result, the accelerated rate of species descriptions has been unfortunately accompanied by numerous cases of overlooking previously described and well documented species, some of them that have been known for more than a century. Here, we critically examined recent literature, phenotypic and molecular data, and detected multiple issues with putative novelties of asexual Ascomycota traditionally known as hyphomycetes. In order to fix these taxonomic problems, three new combinations within the genera Pleopunctum, Camposporium and Sporidesmium, and two new names in Camposporium are proposed. Moreover, three genera, Aquidictyomyces, Fusiconidium and Pseudohelminthosporium, together with nine species are reduced to synonymy. The examples outlined here clearly show the relevance of morphology in modern phylogenetic studies and the importance of more stringent 'quality controls' during biodiversity studies documenting the extensive fungal diversity in a speedy manner.

Indexed as

Asexual AscomycotaDothideomycetesFive new taxaSordariomycetes

Identifiers

PMID34551825
PMCPMC8459516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.