Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551791›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021

Effectiveness of diluted povidone-iodine lavage for preventing periprosthetic joint infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Naomi Kobayashi, Emi Kamono, Kento Maeda, Toshihiro Misumi, Yohei Yukizawa, Yutaka Inaba

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi KobayashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan. naomik58@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-0860
Emi KamonoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Kento MaedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Toshihiro MisumiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Yohei YukizawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Yutaka InabaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University Medical Center · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOf the several methods used to prevent surgical site infection (SSI), diluted povidone-iodine (PI) lavage is used widely. However, the clinical utility of PI for preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of dilute PI lavage for preventing PJI in primary and revision surgery.

methodsThis study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane Library databases was performed. The results are summarized qualitatively and as a meta-analysis of pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Heterogeneity of treatment effects among studies was classified as low, moderate, or high, corresponding to I

resultsAfter the screening and eligibility assessment process, eight studies were finally extracted for analysis. Overall, the results showed that PI had no significant effect on PJI with ununified control group. However, subgroup analysis of studies with a saline control group revealed an odds ratio of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.16-0.71) for the PI group, suggesting a significant effect for preventing PJI.

conclusionThe systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature demonstrates that diluted PI lavage is significantly better than saline solution lavage for preventing PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousProsthesis-Related InfectionsHumansPovidone-IodineSaline SolutionSurgical Wound InfectionTherapeutic IrrigationPovidone-IodineSaline SolutionDiluted povidone-iodine lavagePeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI)Systematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34551791
PMCPMC8456523
OpenAlexW3199863125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.