Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551783›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2021

The consequences of COVID-19 lockdown for formal and informal resource utilization among home-dwelling people with dementia: results from the prospective PAN.DEM study.

Maarja Vislapuu, Renira C Angeles, Line I Berge, Egil Kjerstad, Marie H Gedde, Bettina S Husebo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04043364 (LIVE@Home.Path), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04043364 naunknown statusnot on this map

LIVE@Home.Path: a Mixed Method, Stepped Wedge and Randomized Controlled Trial Innovating the Clinical Pathway for Home-dwelling Persons With Dementia and Their Families

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2019 to 2023Enrolled280ConditionsDementia, Home-dwelling, CaregiverArmsLIVE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Cash-for-care and its impact on older adults' informal and formal long-term care use: evidence from continental European countries.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Mind Care: The Moral Significance of the Dementia Caregiving Dyad.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. "A Raw Blessing" - Caregivers' Experiences Providing Care to Persons Living with Dementia in the COVID-19 Pandemic.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maarja VislapuuDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 17, 5009, Bergen, Norway. maarja.vislapuu@uib.no.
Renira C AngelesNORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bergen, Norway.
Line I BergeDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 17, 5009, Bergen, Norway.
Egil KjerstadNORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bergen, Norway.
Marie H GeddeDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 17, 5009, Bergen, Norway.
Bettina S HuseboDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 17, 5009, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 isolated home-dwelling people with dementia (PwD) from home care services, respite care, and daytime activities. We aimed to investigate the consequences of these restrictions on informal (family, friends) and formal (homecare staff) resource utilization among co-residing (e.g., spouses) and visiting caregivers (e.g., children).

methods105 PwD (≥65 years old) and their caregivers were included in the prospective PANdemic in DEMentia (PAN.DEM) study, which was initiated when the ongoing stepped-wedge, cluster randomized LIVE@Home.Path trial (N = 438) was temporarily halted due to the pandemic. Primary outcome was change in resource utilization assessed by the Resource Utilization in Dementia Care (RUD) instrument in pre- (12 Dec. 2019 to 11 Mar. 2020) and during the lockdown periods (20 April 2020 to 15 May 2020). Degree of cognitive impairment was assessed by Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), and physical functioning and independent living skills by Physical Self-Maintenance Scale and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. Associations between informal and formal care utilization, socio-demographics, and clinical variables were assessed by descriptive statistics and Ordinary Least Squares models (OLS).

resultsMean age for PwD was 81.8 years; 61% were female; 45.6% lived alone, and the mean MMSE score was 20.8 (SD ± 3.7). PwD with co-residents (44%) were younger (78.4 years) than those who were living alone (84.5 years; P < 0.001). During the first 2 months of lockdown, PwD missed on average 20.5 h of formal care in a month (P < 0.001) leading to an approximately 100% increase in informal care, which was particularly pronounced in personal hygiene (6.9 vs. 11.4 days in a month, P < 0.001) and supervision (9.2 vs. 17.6 days in a month; P < 0.001). Visiting caregivers increased by 1.9 days (SD ± 11.5), but co-residing caregivers increased their number of days providing ADL by approximately 7 days per month (β = 6.9; CI, 0.39-13.1, P < 0.05) after adjusting for PwD and caregiver demographics and clinical variables. Decrease in home nursing care was particularly visible for PwD living alone (- 6.1 vs. -1.3 h per month, P = 0.005). Higher cognitive function (β = - 0.64, CI, - 1.26 - 0.02, P = 0.044) was associated with reduction in home nursing service during the lockdown.

conclusionThe care situation for PwD changed dramatically in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for those living alone who received less support from homecare services and visiting caregivers. For future crises and the forthcoming post-pandemic period, health authorities must plan better and identify and prioritize those in greatest need.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT04043364 .

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2CaregiverCOVID-19DementiaFormal careInformal careResource utilization

Identifiers

PMID34551783
PMCPMC8457031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.