Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551750›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2021

Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings - a focus-group study of health care professionals.

Trine Mechta Nielsen, Nina Schjerning, Gudrun Kaldan, Mads Hornum, Bo Feldt-Rasmussen, Thordis Thomsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trine Mechta NielsenDepartment of Nephrology 2132, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. trine.mechta.nielsen@regionh.dk.
Nina SchjerningDepartment of Nephrology 2132, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gudrun KaldanDepartment of Research 7831, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mads HornumDepartment of Nephrology 2132, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bo Feldt-RasmussenDepartment of Nephrology 2132, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thordis ThomsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication nonadherence is common among patients with hemodialysis, leading to poorer patient outcomes. Health care professionals have an important role in assessing risk of nonadherence and intervening to support adherence. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' and nurses' current medication adherence practices in hemodialysis settings.

methodA generic qualitative design with inductive content analysis and focus group methodology. Focus groups with health care professionals were conducted in four Nephrology Centers, representing three different regions of Denmark. An interview guide was developed in collaboration with 3 patient representatives.

resultsSix focus group interviews involving a total of forty-two health care professionals were conducted. Five main categories were identified; Laboratory tests are the "gold standard" for assessing adherence, suggesting that abnormal results motivated investigation of adherence, Varying practices for supporting adherence, alluding to the impact of individual clinician priority and preference on choice of adherence interventions, Unclear allocation of roles and responsibility, specifically referring to uncertainty in the delegation of roles between physicians and nurses, Navigating time and resource limitations, intimating the resources needed to support medication adherence and Suggestions for future strategies.

conclusionsWe suggest implementing systematic use of validated patient-reported outcome measures for assessing adherence and deprescribing tools to support adherence, as these instruments might identify the patients who are in most need of support and promote patient adherence to their prescribed medications. The findings also point to a need for interdisciplinary clarification of roles and responsibilities regarding medication adherence, with the aim of building a strong collaborative partnership between professions.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMedication AdherenceRenal DialysisClinical Laboratory TechniquesFocus GroupsHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProfessional-Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelHemodialysisMedication adherencePatient and public involvementQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34551750
PMCPMC8456602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.