Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551748›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

"The system is well intentioned, but complicated and fallible" interviews with caregivers and decision makers about palliative care in Canada.

Nicole Luymes, Nicole Williams, Liz Garrison, Donna Goodridge, Maria Silveira, Dawn M Guthrie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole LuymesDepartment of Kinesiology & Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole WilliamsDepartment of Kinesiology & Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. nwilliams@wlu.ca.
Liz GarrisonFaculty of Social Work, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Donna GoodridgeCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Maria SilveiraDivision of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan & GRECC, Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Dawn M GuthrieDepartment of Kinesiology & Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Wilfrid Laurier University · CAUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanadian palliative care (PC) philosophy seeks to support individuals in a person-centered and sensitive manner. Unfortunately, philosophy does not necessarily translate into practice and this divide may leave patients without appropriate care at the end of life, causing distress for some families. The primary goal of the study was to identify key factors affecting perceptions of quality PC from the perspective of informal caregivers and decision makers (e.g., program managers) and to understand how their experiences within the health care system may have influenced their perceptions.

methodsNine caregivers and 11 decision makers from Yukon Territory, British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, & Nova Scotia shared their experiences in PC via interview or focus group. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and qualitatively analyzed for themes.

resultsThree themes emerged, including the Caregiver as Anchor, Bewildering System, and Patient, Caregiver, and Family-Centered Care. While these results resembled other studies on caregivers and individuals receiving PC, the present study also uncovered systemic concerns. There was agreement between the two participant groups across most subthemes, however only caregivers reported feelings of being trapped by the health care system and a general lack of respect from health care professionals. Additionally, caregivers stressed the importance of preserving some sort of normalcy in daily life despite the individual's illness.

conclusionsCaregivers are critical. The health care system expects them to help a great deal, but they often do not feel supported or respected and the system is lacking the capacity and resources to meet their needs while they are grieving loss and struggling to meet demands.

Indexed as

CaregiversHospice and Palliative Care NursingDecision MakingHumansOntarioPalliative CareCanadaCaregiversHome carePalliative careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID34551748
PMCPMC8459520
OpenAlexW3201379473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.