Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551713›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2021

Genetic architecture and major genes for backfat thickness in pig lines of diverse genetic backgrounds.

Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla, Jaap Buntjer, Martin Johnsson, Lorena Batista, Federico Diez, Christian R Werner, Ching-Yi Chen, Gregor Gorjanc, Richard J Mellanby, John M Hickey and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Distinct functional roles ofAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Miguel Gozalo-MarcillaThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Jaap BuntjerThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Martin JohnssonThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Lorena BatistaThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Federico DiezThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Christian R WernerThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Ching-Yi ChenThe Pig Improvement Company, Genus plc, Hendersonville, TN, USA.
Gregor GorjancThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Richard J MellanbyThe Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
John M HickeyThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Roger Ros-FreixedesThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK. roger.ros@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-6736
Roslin Institute · GBGenus (United States) · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/ L020467/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009254/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N004736/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N015339/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/30002275Innovate UK 102271Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas Dnr 2016-01386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBackfat thickness is an important carcass composition trait for pork production and is commonly included in swine breeding programmes. In this paper, we report the results of a large genome-wide association study for backfat thickness using data from eight lines of diverse genetic backgrounds.

methodsData comprised 275,590 pigs from eight lines with diverse genetic backgrounds (breeds included Large White, Landrace, Pietrain, Hampshire, Duroc, and synthetic lines) genotyped and imputed for 71,324 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). For each line, we estimated SNP associations using a univariate linear mixed model that accounted for genomic relationships. SNPs with significant associations were identified using a threshold of p < 10

resultsWe found significant associations with backfat thickness for 264 SNPs across 27 genomic regions. Six genomic regions were detected in three or more lines. The average estimate of the SNP-based heritability was 0.48, with estimates by line ranging from 0.30 to 0.58. The genomic regions jointly explained from 3.2 to 19.5% of the additive genetic variance of backfat thickness within a line. Individual genomic regions explained up to 8.0% of the additive genetic variance of backfat thickness within a line. Some of these 27 genomic regions also explained up to 1.6% of the additive genetic variance in lines for which the genomic region was not statistically significant. We identified 64 candidate genes with annotated functions that can be related to fat metabolism, including well-studied genes such as MC4R, IGF2, and LEPR, and more novel candidate genes such as DHCR7, FGF23, MEDAG, DGKI, and PTN.

conclusionsOur results confirm the polygenic architecture of backfat thickness and the role of genes involved in energy homeostasis, adipogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, and insulin signalling pathways for fat deposition in pigs. The results also suggest that several less well-understood metabolic pathways contribute to backfat development, such as those of phosphate, calcium, and vitamin D homeostasis.

Indexed as

GenesGenetic BackgroundGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdipose TissueAnimalsGenomeGenomicsGenotypeSwine

Identifiers

PMID34551713
PMCPMC8459476
OpenAlexW3200291631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.