Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551415›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics

Enhancing Cognitive Restructuring with Concurrent Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Transdiagnostic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Andrada D Neacsiu, Lysianne Beynel, John P Powers, Steven T Szabo, Lawrence G Appelbaum, Sarah H Lisanby, Kevin S LaBar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06333925 (Using Neurostimulation to Accelerate Change in Misophonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06333925 nacompletednot on this map

Using Neurostimulation to Accelerate Change in Misophonia: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled59ConditionsMisophonia, Emotion Dysregulation, Sensory Processing Disorder, Auditory Over ResponsivityArmsHigh Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HF rTMS), Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sham- rTMS), Cognitive Restructuring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrada D NeacsiuDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lysianne BeynelDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
John P PowersDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Steven T SzaboDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lawrence G AppelbaumDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah H LisanbyDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kevin S LaBarDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USDurham VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Non-invasive Neuromodulation Unit (NNU)ZIAMH002955 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2016 to 2025
$40.3M
Duke CTSA (Composite)KL2TR001115 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, KRAFT, MONICA · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmotional dysregulation constitutes a serious public health problem in need of novel transdiagnostic treatments.

objectiveTo this aim, we developed and tested a one-time intervention that integrates behavioral skills training with concurrent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

methodsForty-six adults who met criteria for at least one DSM-5 disorder and self-reported low use of cognitive restructuring (CR) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial that used a between-subjects design. Participants were taught CR and underwent active rTMS applied at 10 Hz over the right (n = 17) or left (n = 14) dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) or sham rTMS (n = 15) while practicing reframing and emotional distancing in response to autobiographical stressors.

resultsThose who received active left or active right as opposed to sham rTMS exhibited enhanced regulation (ds = 0.21-0.62) as measured by psychophysiological indices during the intervention (higher high-frequency heart rate variability, lower regulation duration). Those who received active rTMS over the left dlPFC also self-reported reduced distress throughout the intervention (d = 0.30), higher likelihood to use CR, and lower daily distress during the week following the intervention. The procedures were acceptable and feasible with few side effects.

conclusionsThese findings show that engaging frontal circuits simultaneously with cognitive skills training and rTMS may be clinically feasible, well-tolerated and may show promise for the treatment of transdiagnostic emotional dysregulation. Larger follow-up studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this novel therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultCognitive RestructuringDouble-Blind MethodHumansTreatment OutcomeCognitive controlEmotional dysregulationRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationTransdiagnostic intervention

Identifiers

PMID34551415
PMCPMC8891052
OpenAlexW3201549300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.