Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34551341›Full record

SynthesisTransplantation and cellular therapy2021

Hypomethylating Agents and FLT3 Inhibitors As Maintenance Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Cecily Allen, Abu-Sayeef Mirza, Alyssa A Grimshaw, Smith Giri, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Lohith Gowda, Christina Cho, Martin S Tallman, Amer M Zeidan and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07094464 (A Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase I Clinical Study of Selinexor Combined With Azacitidine for Maintenance Therapy in TP53 Mutant AML/MDS Patients Post-Transplant), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07094464 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase I Clinical Study of Selinexor Combined With Azacitidine for Maintenance Therapy in TP53 Mutant AML/MDS Patients Post-Transplant

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaihong LiuRan2025 to 2028Enrolled20ConditionsTP53-mutated MDS and AML, Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationArmsMaintenance Therapy with Selinexor and Azacitidine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jan Philipp BewersdorfDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cecily AllenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abu-Sayeef MirzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alyssa A GrimshawHarvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Smith GiriDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
Nikolai A PodoltsevDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lohith GowdaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Christina ChoBone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Martin S TallmanLeukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Amer M ZeidanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Maximilian StahlLeukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medical Oncology, Adult Leukemia Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: maximilian_stahl@dfci.harvard.edu.
Yale University · USYale Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEGAN C KING · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
CLINICAL SCHOLARS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009512 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Ping Chi · 1985 to 2026
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisease relapse remains the major cause of death among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who receive an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). Maintenance treatment with FLT3 inhibitors and hypomethylating agents (HMA) has been studied in various clinical trials with mixed results.

objectiveTo synthesize the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of FLT3 inhibitors and HMA for maintenance therapy after allo-HCT in AML and MDS.

methodsFor this systematic review and meta-analysis Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to March 2021 for studies on maintenance therapies after allo-HCT in AML and MDS. Studies were excluded if they were reviews, commentaries, case series with <5 patients, or basic research articles, not published in English, not on post-allo-HCT maintenance with FLT3 inhibitors or HMA in AML or MDS, or if they were clinical trials without published results or duplicate publications from the same patient cohort. Studies with insufficient reporting of the primary endpoint (2-year overall survival [OS]) and studies using FLT3 inhibitors or HMA for pre-emptive treatment of imminent relapse based on positive measurable residual disease testing were excluded. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the primary outcome of 2-year OS. Hazard ratios (HR) for death and relapse were calculated for studies that included a control group. Rates of relapse-free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were studied as secondary endpoints. Downs and Black checklist and risk of bias assessments were used to gauge the quality of individual studies. The study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187298).

resultsOur search strategy identified 5559 studies. Twenty-one studies with a total of 809 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The 2-year OS rates were 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.8%-87.7%) and 65.7% (95% CI, 55.1%-74.9%) among patients treated with FLT3 inhibitors and HMA, respectively. In sensitivity analyses restricted to studies that included a control group, maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors (HR for death = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.62) or HMA (HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.66) appeared superior to no maintenance therapy. The 2-year RFS rates were 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-83.9%) and 62.4% (95% CI, 50.6%-72.9%) among patients treated with FLT3 inhibitors and HMA, respectively. Rates of any grade acute and chronic GVHD were 33.1% (95% CI, 25.4%-41.8%; grade 3/4: 16.5%) and 42.5% (95% CI, 26.3%-60.4%) among FLT3 inhibitor and 42.7% (95% CI, 33.5%-52.4%; grade 3/4: 8.1%) and 41.5% (95% CI, 32.0%-51.6%) among HMA-treated patients, respectively.

conclusionMaintenance therapy with either FLT3 inhibitors or HMA after allo-HCT can lead to prolonged and improved OS and RFS with a favorable safety profile. Additional studies are needed to define the optimal duration of treatment, the role of measurable residual disease status, and transplant characteristics in patient selection.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyelodysplastic Syndromesfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3HumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsFLT3 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3Protein Kinase InhibitorsAcute myeloid leukemiaAMLHypomethylating agentMaintenance therapySorafenibTransplant

Identifiers

PMID34551341
PMCPMC9533376
OpenAlexW3200261765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.