Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550986›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A natural history museum visitor survey of perception, attitude and knowledge (PAK) of microbes and antibiotics.

Julia Zichello, Preeti Gupta, Monique Scott, Bella Desai, Ruth Cohen, Lauri Halderman, Susan Perkins, Ana Porzecanski, Paul J Planet, Yael Wyner and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A kiosk survey of perception, attitudes and knowledge (PAK) of Australians concerning microbes, antibiotics, probiotics and hygiene.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Julia ZichelloEducation Department, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of America.
Preeti GuptaEducation Department, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of America.
Monique ScottEducation Department, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of America.
Bella DesaiEducation Department, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of America.
Ruth CohenEducation Department, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of America.
Lauri HaldermanExhibition Department, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of America.
Susan PerkinsAmerican Museum of Natural History, Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, New York, NY, United States of America.
Ana PorzecanskiAmerican Museum of Natural History, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, New York, NY, United States of America.
Paul J PlanetDivision of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine & Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Yael WynerCity College of New York, School of Education, New York, NY, United States of America.
Martin BlaserDepartment of Medicine and Microbiology, RBHS, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.
Robert BurkDepartment of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Judy DiamondUniversity of Nebraska State Museum, Lincoln, NE, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1366-6325
Rod KennettQuestacon, The National Science and Technology Centre of Australia, King Edward Terrace, Parkes, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Jennifer BorlandRockman Et Al, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Rob DeSalleAmerican Museum of Natural History, Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-7109

Funding

Human Health, Biodiversity, and Microbial Ecology: Strategies to EducateR25OD016514 · OD · AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY · PI DESALLE, ROB JOSEPH, GUPTA, PREETI · 2014 to 2017
$883k
NIH HHS R25 OD016514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A kiosk-based survey at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City in 2016-2018 allowed us to assess public knowledge of antibiotics and public attitudes toward microbes in museum goers. Over 22,000 visitors from 172 countries and territories answered several carefully designed questions about microbes and antibiotics. These visitors also entered age, gender, and country demographic data that allowed for stratification along these demographic and geographic divisions. Because museum goers are likely to be better informed about these and other science-based topics, the results described here can set a potential upper bound for public knowledge on these topics. Surprisingly, the results of our analysis of museum goers' answers about microbes and antibiotics indicate a substantial lack of familiarity with both topics. For example, overall only about 50% of respondents can correctly identify penicillin as an antibiotic and less than 50% of museum visitors view microbes as beneficial. The results described here suggest that we are perhaps off target with our educational efforts in this area and that a major shift in approach toward more basic microbial topics is warranted in our educational efforts.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMuseumsNatural HistoryPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaData AnalysisHumansLanguageAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34550986
PMCPMC8457478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.