Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550809›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2021

Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

Romney Humphries, April M Bobenchik, Janet A Hindler, Audrey N Schuetz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,201 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,201citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,201 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Emergence ofVirulence · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic correlates of ceftazidime-avibactam collateral sensitivity in tigecycline-resistant NDM-producing enterobacter cloacae complex.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Romney HumphriesVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6568-156X
April M BobenchikLifespan Academic Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Janet A HindlerLos Angeles County Department of Public Health, Public Health Laboratories, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Audrey N SchuetzMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-270X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) develops and publishes standards and guidelines for AST methods and results interpretation in an annual update to the

Indexed as

LaboratoriesOxacillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsOxacillinantimicrobial susceptibility testingCLSIM100

Identifiers

PMID34550809
PMCPMC8601225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.