Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550783›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Rhizobacteria Impact Colonization of Listeria monocytogenes on Arabidopsis thaliana Roots.

Alexi A Schoenborn, Haley Clapper, Noam Eckshtain-Levi, Elizabeth A Shank

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Towards improved biofilm models.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexi A SchoenbornDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillgrid.10698.36, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2998-638X
Haley ClapperDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillgrid.10698.36, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9895-538X
Noam Eckshtain-LeviDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillgrid.10698.36, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6292-7309
Elizabeth A ShankDepartment of Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4804-1966
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Using Co-culture and Bioinformatics to Discover New Antibiotic BioactivitiesR01GM112981 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHANK, ELIZABETH ANNE · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) GM112981NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112981U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0013887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of its relevance as a foodborne pathogen, we have limited knowledge about Listeria monocytogenes in the environment. L. monocytogenes outbreaks have been linked to fruits and vegetables; thus, a better understanding of the factors influencing its ability to colonize plants is important. We tested how environmental factors and other soil- and plant-associated bacteria influenced L. monocytogenes' ability to colonize plant roots using Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings in a hydroponic growth system. We determined that the successful root colonization of L. monocytogenes 10403S was modestly but significantly enhanced by the bacterium being pregrown at higher temperatures, and this effect was independent of the biofilm and virulence regulator PrfA. We tested 14 rhizosphere-derived bacteria for their impact on L. monocytogenes 10403S, identifying one that enhanced and 10 that inhibited the association of 10403S with plant roots. We also characterized the outcomes of these interactions under both coinoculation and invasion conditions. We characterized the physical requirements of five of these rhizobacteria to impact the association of L. monocytogenes 10403S with roots, visualizing one of these interactions by microscopy. Furthermore, we determined that two rhizobacteria (one an inhibitor, the other an enhancer of 10403S root association) were able to similarly impact 10 different L. monocytogenes strains, indicating that the effects of these rhizobacteria on L. monocytogenes are not strain specific. Taken together, our results advance our understanding of the parameters that affect L. monocytogenes plant root colonization, knowledge that may enable us to deter its association with and, thus, downstream contamination of, food crops.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisListeria monocytogenesPlant RootsRhizobiaceaeRhizosphereSoil Microbiologyfood-borne pathogenshydroponicsListeriaListeria monocytogenesplant-microbe interactions

Identifiers

PMID34550783
PMCPMC8579980
OpenAlexW3200253438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.