Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550601›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

Association of mental health diagnosis with race and all-cause mortality after a cancer diagnosis: Large-scale analysis of electronic health record data.

William C Chen, Lauren Boreta, Steve E Braunstein, Michael W Rabow, Lawrence E Kaplan, Jessica D Tenenbaum, Olivier Morin, Catherine C Park, Julian C Hong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Symptom burden and outcomes among patients with early-onset versus average-onset neuroendocrine neoplasms.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William C ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8924-5853
Lauren BoretaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Steve E BraunsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Michael W RabowDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, and Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Lawrence E KaplanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Jessica D TenenbaumDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Olivier MorinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Catherine C ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Julian C HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-6889
University of California, San Francisco · USDuke University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisparity in mental health care among cancer patients remains understudied.

methodsA large, retrospective, single tertiary-care institution cohort study was conducted based on deidentified electronic health record data of 54,852 adult cancer patients without prior mental health diagnosis (MHD) diagnosed at the University of California, San Francisco between January 2012 and September 2019. The exposure of interest was early-onset MHD with or without psychotropic medication (PM) within 12 months of cancer diagnosis and primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

resultsThere were 8.2% of patients who received a new MHD at a median of 197 days (interquartile range, 61-553) after incident cancer diagnosis; 31.0% received a PM prescription; and 3.7% a mental health-related visit (MHRV). There were 62.6% of patients who were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 10.8% were Asian, 9.8% were Hispanic, and 3.8% were Black. Compared with NHWs, minority cancer patients had reduced adjusted odds of MHDs, PM prescriptions, and MHRVs, particularly for generalized anxiety (Asian odds ratio [OR], 0.66, 95% CI, 0.55-0.78; Black OR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.45-0.79; Hispanic OR, 0.72, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85) and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (Asian OR, 0.43, 95% CI, 0.37-0.50; Black OR, 0.51, 95% CI, 0.40-0.61; Hispanic OR, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.70-0.89). New early MHD with PM was associated with elevated all-cause mortality (12-24 months: hazard ratio [HR], 1.43, 95% CI, 1.25-1.64) that waned by 24 to 36 months (HR, 1.18, 95% CI, 0.95-1.45).

conclusionsNew mental health diagnosis with PM was a marker of early mortality among cancer patients. Minority cancer patients were less likely to receive documentation of MHDs or treatment, which may represent missed opportunities to identify and treat cancer-related mental health conditions.

Indexed as

Mental HealthNeoplasmsAdultCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsHumansRetrospective Studiesdistresselectronic health recordmental healthpsychooncologypsychotropic medication

Identifiers

PMID34550601
PMCPMC8738115
OpenAlexW3199858935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.