ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Association between exposure to heavy occupational lifting and cardiac structure and function: a cross-sectional analysis from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical Activity and Arterial Stiffness: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Review
- Associations between occupational physical activity and left ventricular structure and function over 25 years in CARDIA.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Relationship between cumulative exposure to occupational lifting throughout working life and risk of ischemic heart disease in men and women. The Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank.Annals of work exposures and health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate cross-sectional associations between heavy occupational lifting and cardiac structure and function. Participants from the 5th round of the Copenhagen City Heart Study, aged < 65 years old, answering a questionnaire regarding occupational physical activity, heavy occupational lifting, use of anti-hypertensive and heart medication, and data on blood pressure, cardiac structure and function, from an echocardiographic examination, were included. Adjusted linear regressions and logistic regressions were applied to estimate the cross-sectional association between heavy occupational lifting and cardiac structure and function across all included participants and in groups stratified by hypertension status, and the risk for having abnormal values of cardiac structure and function. 2511 participants were included. The cross-sectional standardized associations between heavy occupational lifting and measures of cardiac structure and function showed a trends for raised left ventricular mass index (LVMi) (β 0.14, 99% CI - 0.03 to 0.31). The standardized associations stratified by hypertensive status showed significant associations between exposure to heavy occupational lifting and LVMi (β 0.20, 99% CI - 0.002 to 0.40) and a trend of a raised end-diastolic interventricular septal thickness (IVSd) (β 0.15, 99% CI - 0.03 to 0.33) among normotensives. Exposure to heavy occupational lifting increased the odds for an abnormal IVSd (OR 1.42, 99% CI 1.07-1.89). This cross-sectional study shows heavy occupational lifting to associate with indices of abnormal cardiac structure and function among normotensives, indicating an increased risk for cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34550509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.