Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550469›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2022

Predictive semiology of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in an epilepsy monitoring unit.

Andrew J Duncan, Ivana Peric, Ray Boston, Udaya Seneviratne

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07742709 (Clinical Utility of the Abrupt Clap Provocation Test for Rapid Differentiation of Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures From Epileptic Seizures), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07742709 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Utility of the Abrupt Clap Provocation Test for Rapid Differentiation of Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures From Epileptic Seizures

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorXijing HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled1,000ConditionsEpilepsy, Psychogenic Non-epileptic SeizuresArmsAbrupt Clap Provocation Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Seminars in epileptology: How to diagnose status epilepticus in adults and children.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew J DuncanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. andrew.duncan@svha.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-7637
Ivana PericDepartment of Neurology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ray BostonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Udaya SeneviratneDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-9702
Monash Medical Centre · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is a common clinical dilemma. We sought to assess the diagnostic value of four ictal signs commonly used in differentiating PNES from epileptic seizures (ES).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult video-electroencephalogram (VEM) studies conducted at a single tertiary epilepsy center between May 2009 and August 2016. Each event was assessed by a blinded rater for the presence of four signs: fluctuating course, head shaking, hip thrusting, and back arching. The final diagnosis of PNES or ES was established for each event based on clinical and VEM characteristics. All ES were pooled regardless of focal or generalized onset. We analyzed the odds ratio of each sign in PNES in comparison to ES with adjustment for repeated measures using logistic regression. Additionally, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of each sign to diagnose PNES.

resultsA total of 742 events from 140 VEM studies were assessed. Fluctuating course (odds ratio (OR) 37.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.56-102.96, P < 0.0001), head shaking (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.26-6.79, P = 0.012), and hip thrusting (OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.21-15.18, P = 0.02) were each significantly predictive of PNES. Fluctuating course had the highest sensitivity (76.16%). Back arching (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.35-3.20, P = 0.92) was not significantly associated with PNES.

conclusionFluctuating course, head shaking, and hip thrusting are semiological features significantly more common in PNES than ES. Fluctuating course is the most reliable sign. Back arching does not appear to differentiate PNES from ES.

Indexed as

EpilepsySeizuresAdultElectroencephalographyHumansRetrospective StudiesVideo RecordingDiagnosisEpilepsyPNESPredictive valueSensitivityVideo-EEG

Identifiers

PMID34550469
PMCPMC8456070
OpenAlexW3199880373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.