Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34550463›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2022

Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination in "real-world" clinical practice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Juraj Sokol, Tomas Guman, Juraj Chudej, Monika Hlebaskova, Natalia Stecova, Lubica Valekova, Monika Kucerikova, Jan Stasko

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juraj SokolDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Tomas GumanDepartment of Hematology and Oncohematology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Kosice, Slovakia. tomasguman19@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2719-0540
Juraj ChudejDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Monika HlebaskovaDepartment of Hematology and Oncohematology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Kosice, Slovakia.
Natalia StecovaDepartment of Hematology and Oncohematology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Kosice, Slovakia.
Lubica ValekovaDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Monika KucerikovaDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Jan StaskoDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.

Funding

agentúra na podporu výskumu a vývoja APVV-17-0054vedecká grantová agentúra mšvvaš sr a sav VEGA 1/0187/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ixazomib is approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received at least one previous therapy. Registration study "TOURMALINE MM-1" was published in 2016. Nevertheless, clinical trials are significantly different from real-world use. From June 2016 to December 2018, IRd was available for Slovak patients with relapsed/refractory MM through a Named Patient Program. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixazomib. We analyzed in this cohort study outcomes of 106 MM patients treated with IRd at 2 academic centers. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (44-78). The median number of prior lines was 2 (1-7). The majority had high international staging system (ISS) score: 18, 29, and 59 were in the ISS I, ISS II, and ISS III groups, respectively. Treatment continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 29 (0-49) months. The overall response rate was 74.5% (complete remission, 7.5%; partial remission, 67%). The median overall survival was not reached. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 43 months (95% CI 35.6-50.4). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves, and we compared the influence of different factors on PFS. The most common hematological adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (90.4%), anemia (55.6%), and thrombocytopenia (43.4%). Our real-world data support the use of IRd as a highly effective and well-tolerated oral treatment protocol for relapsed myeloma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnemiaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBoron CompoundsCohort StudiesDexamethasoneFemaleGlycineHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBoron CompoundsDexamethasoneGlycineixazomibLenalidomideEffectivenessIxazomibMultiple myelomaReal-world dataRelapsed/refractorySafety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.